The GFS and NAM look too cold near the low. The real accumulation is more in the firehose. If that moves SE than yeah that will push higher totals SE too.
I wonder how many of the “I’m not putting that vaccine in my body” light up a cigarette and throw back a bottle of JD. probably a positive correlation.
Yeah that hits western CT good into the Berks and clipping hubby on north. Just north of H7. Hopefully that can tick SE some. We know Kevin deep down wants it.
They're being clear and transparent which is what is needed. It's an extremely low number and there's probably more side effects from taking ibuprofen compared to that number. But, I get it.
Yeah I’d say this is more nrn ORH and north. Tucks in a little too close south of pike I think, but could end as snow. Those Ptype maps show snow where DGZ dries out and I think it’s going to be tough to snow where that happens.
Another thing I noticed on the euro op, is that it CAA from the NE at 925. That's a lot better than waiting for it to dynamically flip and then have to wait for winds to back a bit and drag colder and drier air south.
EPS looks sweet for a lot of the higher elevated areas. Maybe ORH north is best if one judges mid level low placement/RH...but even as it pulls away, a change to snow probably in interior lower elevated spots towards Saturday morning.