psuhoffman

@frd that GEPS day 16 I posted as a joke does look like what you would get if you mashed phase 2 and phase 6 together in February... We need to hope that the phase 6 wave relaxes enough to let the IO forcing become dominant at times. My guess is if they both offset we get a blah pattern...not totally god awful but probably not good enough. What doesn't help is I suspect the mjo pac forcing is more strongly correlated to our pattern than the IO forcing...I would rather a favorable wave in the PAC phase 8/1 offsetting an unfavorable one in the eastern IO than the other way around...

My guess is if we don't get cold it will have to do with the IO forcing being offset by the unfavorable forcing in the west pacific where convection continues to want to reform around phase 6.

Yep...that period continues to hold promise. But let’s say we don’t get lucky in that window...and it goes to this... -epo,-AO, -NAO and a raging southeast ridge lol. That looks like the conflict beteeen the dueling convection in the IO and west pacific. We get the high lat response of the IO wave but also the Se ridge of the pac wave. That would be the final kick to the Nads from this winter! i suppose on the optimistic side if the se ridge gets suppressed in that look it sets up a prettt epic boundary wave pattern

My impression is they take themselves a little too seriously. But to each their own. I like it here.

Can something bust if we never expected anything? Bob said it yesterday... we keep forcing “threats” because we’re bored but we know these are all lottery ticket odds.

Maybe. Trying to figure out specific details of NS vorts in a progressive flow is difficult at 48 hours. At 6 days forget it.

If it’s goinf to work it almost has too phase with one of them clean. There is a train of NS shortwaves flying across keeping the flow flat over top of it. Unless it hitches it’s wagon to a NS wave that digs enough to capture its in trouble. Perhaps if the stj wave ejected whole but the ships sailing on that and its circular thinking. The progressive flow shearing the top of the stj wave is what causes the reaction of the wave stretching and leaving too much energy behind in Mexico.

What happened?

Context matters 1. It’s been awful 2. everyone is having fun with it 3. Everything is still a loooong ways out 4. No one is being a jerk or antagonizing anyone 5. No one is going overboard and trying to intentionally derail the thread. If people go too far and it turns ugly then moderation is needed. I’m not in favor of heavy mod. But in the past we have had a few people who didn’t have any concept of boundaries or common sense. Or they were intentionally trying to troll the thread over and over.

He will complain if that does verify that 15” over 4 days is lame and it should have been 30”

HH delivers. seriously screw next weekends puke airmass phase needing garbage storm. I’ll sign up for week 2 of the gfs and call it a winter! No regrets. Give me the contract right now. My pen is ready.

There were major differences but simply in terms of the play we need between streams a similarity to dec 2009. That was undecided until 72 hours. The Canada ridge is creating a similar effect on the storm track as the NAO block did in 2009. Obviously the NAO block created a much better temp regime though. The Canadian ridge with a +EPO/NAO combo is a much warmer pattern. But the pna ridge axis is similar and the issues with needing some northern stream help to amplify a wave along the coast is similar. It’s a much trickery setup than something like Jan 2016 or Feb 2010 when you have a strong stj wave and a broad full conus trough and no NS in the way. This requires interaction between multiple moving parts. It won’t be resolved as easy at range. I am not comparing the snow potential to any of those systems just the storm amplitude and track. Truth is if we had real cold we would have some HECS potential. The guidance that does phase really goes crazy. Still don’t favor that. But even if we get the phase unlike Dec 2009 we could still fail because of the awful airmass.

I knew I had seen the look at the end of the EPS before... EPS March 4 2015 Feb 2 1996 Right before 2 warning level events...there are other examples but those 2 stuck out in my memory from a similar pattern. Both were similar, progressive waves along the boundary. That look can work.

It's probably unlikely...12z on the whole trended the wrong way. But since the critical feature now is a northern stream one that does make me a little more hesitant to close the door since even King Euro struggles with the exact details on those. The STJ on its own isn't going to get it done though... not enough is ejecting and there is way too much going on on top of it...so the key is does the NS dig enough to phase and pull it up. The euro gets the NS shortwave out ahead and so it squashes it. It's all about timing and how much the NS digs...and I would definitely trust the euro along with ensembles over the GEM/GFS ops with that...but its a tricky enough thing that I am not totally 100 percent putting it to bed. But I am only keeping one eye on it...very much interested in the period after.

Gefs walked back from the ledge day 16 too. Clear step towards the eps idea of where the pattern goes in mid February. Again not perfect but a pattern we can snow with a little luck. At least cold would be in the conus.

People who want clarity with things past 5 days will be disappointed but the big picture is the pattern looks less hostile in early Feb and we’re starting to get some random op runs and scattering of ensemble members with hits. That doesn’t suddenly mean I’m gonna forget the seasonal trend or lose my skepticism but it’s hard not to think we at least have more of a chance the next 2 weeks that we have at anytime this winter. Again low bar and all.

Their advancement is outpacing ours. Wish that only applied to NWP.

You can tell all the heavy snow SW of DC is in elevated regions. Then there is that band that starts near DC northeast. Just from that I can deduce that the system phases and the deform starts to crank from there northeast. Gfs and gem shared one commonality. They were both slightly late on the phase to really bomb our area. But that’s not that uncommon. Unfortunately in many other setups we can get a 4-8” storm in its formative stages while Philly northeast gets 10”+. But with the temp issues this time the cutoff between lot of snow and nothing could be less forgiving. That is just one of many obstacles but 12z has been kind so far.

I love it when we have to be confused about “which storm” a post is about. That’s at least a sign things are improving

Depends what you mean. The most probable outcome is no snow. Way more still has to go right than wrong. And if we do get snow the most likely outcome is minor accumulation due to either temp issues cutting down accumulation or some issue like an unclean phase scenario cutting down QPF. But if you’re asking if it’s hypotheticall possible to get a big snow...yea it’s possible. Rare. But there have been rare examples of similar thermally challenges setups where everything went perfect and Baltimore got like 8” of snow. Kind of like when an average weekend golfer lines up for some 175 yard approach shot. What are the odds that shot goes exactly how he envisions it and ends up right next to the hole? I wouldn’t put money on it but every once in a while...

Too early to know how it ends but the gem took a major step in the right direction at h5. Way less of a NS squash fest and more STJ involved.

FRINGED!!! its happening

The phase was slightly late. The ccb deform doesn’t really get cranking because of that. It’s being pinched on its NW side by the unclean phase going on between the NS and SS systems. It was close to big though.

This gfs run was even closer to the unicorn scenario @showmethesnow Highlighted this morning. Oh so close. You can see here the NS phases in slightly late. You can see the initial STJ wave out ahead there with the main NS dining into VA. If that had been a slightly cleaner capture we get that 980 low tucked in more are it’s the unicorn big snow scenario. Temps would have been “ok” on this run we needed a slightly better phase and tucked solution to turn it into a big one. That scenario is still low probability. So much has to go right. But the gfs op almost pulled it off so that probably means the idea isn’t totally dead.

I apply my philosophy for Eagles games to long range model runs. You’re never as good as you think after a win and never as bad as you think after a loss. Unless you’re a Redskins fan. Then you are as bad as you think.