Jump to content

psuhoffman

Members
  • Posts

    26,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by psuhoffman

  1. That’s a kick in the nads after the improvements on the ops
  2. Lol it’s good overall. We knew the euro all alone was not going to be exactly right. This progression gives us a way way better chance then the fully phased idea the gfs was tossing around before. But it’s never easy. This solution is also better for the follow up wave.
  3. A compromise between the euro and gfs camps from a day ago. It’s coming out in pieces but they are spaced tighter then the euro had. Problem is if we don’t get enough separation between the waves it won’t work. It’s close.
  4. I’ve thought about this and I think it would be more helpful if past day 6 only ran once a day but that one run was a super ensemble that incorporated the initializations of all 4 interim runs to account for possible errors with initialization. One more accurate update a day would be more helpful then a bunch of mini ones. And cause us way less mental anguish. A Day 7+ Forecast doesn’t need to be updated more then once a day anyways.
  5. Yea but instead of bringing the NS across ahead it stalls it out west and pumps the ridge anyways on top of the unphased southern wave. Still not the progression we want. But I suppose a baby step towards a better idea.
  6. Well oddly enough the eps isn’t that bad. It does have a camp that trended north. But there is also a camp of good hits still and the snow mean increased slightly from 12z. And the signal for the day 11 threat I’ve liked got better. The pattern dies degrade by day 15 though but it’s not awful. The -NAO holds but we need the western trough to either back off or shift its. It’s kind of in the worst spot and offsetting the NAO by day 15.
  7. I’m not going to over react to one run but the trend the last 24 hours has been discouraging. Let’s see what happens tomorrow.
  8. Guidance is in flux. I wouldn’t go with anything yet. If the ridge can retrograde west we could still get something to cut through and dive into the east. Depends what the NAO ridge does. If it continues south we’re screwed. If it rotates back north we would be ok.
  9. If that ridge links up that way it doesn’t just wreck the one threat. All the cold from the epo ridge will be trapped west. The trough won’t progress east it will just continue to pump the ridge to its east.
  10. At 12z cmc was the only op showing that. But ensembles had it and now the para at 18 and 0z. But if I said “wait it’s the next wave” earlier some would have had a fit so I just kept my mouth shut.
  11. Yea but that was bone dry remember. We needed in between lol. I wouldn’t freak over a day 13 op run. If the ensembles go that way over the next couple days then yea....it’s going to depend on that ridge link up. If the gfs is right about a complete link of the mid and high latitude ridges like that it’s game over. But nothing else shows that and the gefs is skeptical of that progression.
  12. Cmc isn’t that bad Imo. It’s still 9 days away (especially if it’s the trailing wave). Cmc doesn’t have enough separation between waves to work. But it’s close. That wouldn’t take much adjustment. It’s not like the gfs that wants to drive a ridge to the North Pole and nuke the whole pattern!
  13. @Ji what’s sad is that if someone just sneezes while facing north a ridge pops to the Arctic circle these days regardless of the pattern. Any freaking excuse and warmth wants to surge north.
  14. A lot of the good ensembles in the Eps and gefs have that progression. That might be the best way here if that ridge is going to pump like that. A weak wave to knock it down then something behind. We need the trough to eject pieces to prevent the ridge from going ape.
  15. Honestly from a pattern progression the cmc was always in the gfs camp. The op pumped the ridge same way but less extreme buy it also washed out that first wave. No one pointed out the snowstorm the cmc showed was actually from the NEXT wave and was a days later lol. And for that progression to work required the first lead wave to wash out and it was the only model showing that lol. But the cmc ensembles were fully in the gfs camp without that wonky split wave idea. I didn’t want to kill the mood by pointing that out though.
  16. The GFS pumps the ridge so far north the first wave cuts so severely it might destroy the setup for the next behind it. It gets trapped so far NW we get no 50/50 and enough ridging for the next wave to possibly cut also. Lol.
  17. A little similar to some of the 1994 ice storms wrt pattern there. But I’m not getting into that. I don’t like ice. Could care less ice v rain unless there is snowcover to preserve.
  18. And gfs looks exactly like it... For reference this is what the euro looks like at about the same time... It’s a huge difference but really due to a rather subtle difference that has huge impacts on the pattern. The euro ejects the western trough in pieces and such never pumps the ridge. The gfs and Icon does not and pumps the ridge. Looking across ensemble members that’s a consistent theme between good v bad members on both gefs and eps. We need the western trough to eject pieces east to knock down the ridge. Otherwise it pumps a ridge that links up with the NAO “block” and its game over
  19. Icon did not get us off to a glorious start. It says “what block? Why don’t I just blast a ridge from Mexico to Greenland instead.” Before anyone bothers to look...It’s raining in Green Bay there.
  20. I was at that game. 1993. He beat the Eagles at the Vet. If I recall we had like a 1 point lead and then the dolphins got a late FG to win.
×
×
  • Create New...