Jump to content

psuhoffman

Members
  • Posts

    27,142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by psuhoffman

  1. I called someone a bigot today (for being a blatant bigot not political) and his response was “I’m not a FCKN bigot youse a fagot”
  2. The AIFS eps has a known under dispersion issue. So when it’s good it can be very good. And then it flips to nothing a run later. Thats a flaw with its ens. Any well distributed ensemble system from 200 hours isn’t going to snow some super crazy signal because at that range there should be a lot of variance to the perturbations.
  3. I just realized that was a 10-1 map. After looking at the kuchy I can push it to 60!
  4. Flurries in Hanover. I need a coating bad. There is deer piss and sh!t all over the snow.
  5. Can we compromise on 50? DC metro deserves it…but man don’t F over the northern fringes for the southern portion of our sub. They are doing like 200% better wrt climo the last 5 years than I am.
  6. I showed you yesterday how the EPS was so close and if that Baja wave just ejected a bit more energy…boom. Once in a long while I know what I’m talking about. There are still 5000 little things that can go wrong. Over amping becomes an issue if it ejects too much. Remember Jan 25! This time we won’t have arctic cold to offset a hostile track. But when guidance was squashing the thing I knew there was a good chance it came back because it needed a slight adjustment in a way models often are biased.
  7. In fairness it’s run 4 times a day and taking every time it spits out one random run at 200+ hours with snow isn’t fair to categorize it as “predicting a snowstorm”. This is only the 3rd time it was consistently hitting a specific storm for multiple runs. One is them ended up good. The other not. We will see.
  8. @Stormchaserchuck1 the 2 times recently we got significant Atlantic side help during the 2nd half of the winter during a -PNA period we did stay cold and somewhat snowy. Late Jan early Feb 2021 and March 2018. I don’t think the blocking coming up will equal those two BUT we have a much colder antecedent airmass also so those two might wash out.
  9. it was a weaker version of Feb 5 2010. Much weaker which duh Nina. But synoptically the same idea and progression. -PNA, pac wave ejects and is forced east under a block and can’t gain any latitude. Take the CMC and amp that wave a bit more and that’s our win scenario
  10. The blocking trended better but the wave leaves too much energy behind and the EPS washes it out on most members as the weaker wave that ejects gets shredded by the flow. We need a stronger wave with that look
  11. @CAPE WRT AIFS ENS There are only 2 members that have any snow at all from the lead wave next week. The median snowfall from Saturday evening to Monday evening of PD weekend is about 3-4" across our area. The mean is closer to 5". The split is about 30% of the members have a VERY big storm with a classic 95 points NW MECS/HECS signature. Then there are another 20% that have something pretty decent...2-4 to 4-6" type storms...a few members have something very minor and about 40% have absolutely nothing. It was an improvement over the last 3 runs and got us back to where we were 24 hours ago when I made that post showing how "interesting" they looked. BUt yes...the total mean is inflated some. BTW, they are interested in your window too...the median spikes up another 1-3" during your period and the mean about 2-3" which is significant for that lead time
×
×
  • Create New...