Jump to content

LakePaste25

Members
  • Posts

    1,351
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LakePaste25

  1. While I may not agree with the Euro verbatim, it’s a perfect example of how a stronger Nino doesn’t always mean warmer. The August update increased the strength but went cooler.
  2. I wouldn’t dare predict a snowless winter. There’s no data to back that up. But I would place heavy bets on +3 or higher in terms of temp departures in the mean, locally.
  3. I will place a heavy bet that Nino 1+2 will once again, not cool off as we head into next spring. This is why I don’t yet think we swing back to a major La Niña. Cold neutral is once again on the table next year.
  4. I keep circling back to the PMM. 2023-24 was a rare -PMM El Niño. Right now it’s positive. In the summer, -PMM constructively interferes with El Nino, while it destructively interferes during the winter. +PMM is the opposite (Nina like summer, but Nino like winter). Unfortunately we don’t have current PMM values but eyeballing SSTAs show it in the positive state, which implies more Nino-friendly interference as we head towards winter.
  5. My thing is, if the most record breaking El Niño of my life (and potentially by a huge margin) doesn’t do the job, then the climate system has been messed up to the point where we’ve lost a major predictability factor in ENSO. It’s possible. But I hope not.
  6. I get the reluctance for some to take a “wait and see” approach to see if the NH actually couples. But at the same time, just make a call. I think it’ll couple, and couple well. Sure, we can count on a less expansive area of below normal anomalies than the 1983 Aleutian Low due to warming. It is what it is. But otherwise it’ll couple in the NH and if i’m wrong i’m wrong.
  7. This is like me saying you don’t agree it’s east based because you don’t like using the ELI. I simply didn’t like how the MEI was a limited dataset nor did I need to wait for this monthly updated to figure out it was coupled.
  8. We can agree to disagree. SOI, VP anomalies, and OLR anomalies will also tell me if it’s coupled and I much prefer using those. I’m just not a fan of using it.
  9. That was me who was dismissing the MEI awhile ago and you still don’t see me posting about it. Just not a fan of it. It’s equally weighting all variables, only uses one dataset (JRA-55), and like ensonerd mentioned it’s limited to the first EOF. I felt like it made the 2023-24 event weaker than it was even compared to the RONI, thanks to the rare -PMM that went with it.
  10. Yes. -PDO is not the cause, it’s an effect of the pattern.
  11. How is 55 degree water “overriding El Niño”? I’m sorry I just don’t buy that
  12. For the NH at least, it appears to be a better fit for +PMM, which is an actual pattern driver much more so than the PDO.
  13. Not exactly strong correlations to begin with in the NH, with the exception of the low southwest of the Aleutian’s that appears to be displaced about 60 degrees east.
  14. TBH i’m not really thrilled on how mild it’ll be but I also like extremes, and this will be the most extreme El Niño on record, which fascinates me. Plus I think the +QBO could really reinforce it. It should be interesting
  15. Those late phasers are always solid here for NW flow up the hills. 97-98 was pretty decent here. When they phase early as full coastal blizzards, I tend to do worse because they usher in polar high pressure too quickly. Happened a lot in years like 09-10. I don’t expect even 97-98 again considering how much it’s warmed since then but I’ll take an active coastal track regardless if most are rainstorms. Also looking forward to watching SVR outbreaks down south.
  16. I’m thinking weak to moderate positive (+.5 to +1.5) peak before it dips negative later next summer and probably doesn’t flip back to long term positive until the 2030s.
  17. I can’t get over how CFS is just absolutely bonkers with how extremely east based it models the Nino. Convection/Hadley cell is so far east that the SE canada/NE US ridge backdoors itself into a -NAO. Likely overdoing it and we probably see something east of CANSIPs but west of the CFS, but it’s interesting to see the patterns that it is spitting out. Very possible this ends up being the most east-based El Niño in observed history.
  18. To be fair, the ONI is actually being punished here because of how fast the W Pacific has been warming. So for the purposes of trying to determine the extent of suppressed convection in the MC/W Pac and enhanced convection near the dateline into the E pac, RONI seems to be useful here
  19. PDO correlation +PDO = more troughing in the east. 97-98 would’ve been an extreme torch without the +PDO.
  20. It interferes by *weakening* the SE trough and making it *even warmer* meanwhile a 97-98 type pattern increases the chances of a big snowstorm via the active southern stream. That winter came very close to multiple KUs that barely missed the cold air phase. 82-83/15-16 produced one and had +PDOs as well. In my several years of tracking weather it has always been preferable to have a +PDO and is backed up by evidence. “-PDO means less el niño so it’s snowier” is such a wrong way to view it. You *always* want a +PDO in the East, and hopefully it flips and we get that!
  21. 1972-1973 is the only super Nino analog we have of the -PDO not flipping into winter. However, the RONI peaked at +2.3 and we are potentially going much higher than that this time around, so it could be such an overwhelming force that it flips to +
  22. Are there really weenies out there that think a -PDO will “counteract El Niño and make it colder and snowier?” That is such a baseless take. -PDO interferes in a way that makes it warmer, not colder. You WANT it to flip +PDO. I think the sad part is, some of these accounts know this but they’re lying and giving out doses of hopium to the less informed weenies just for money.
  23. 97-98 was not half bad for the Great Lakes/SNE if i remember correctly. December ‘97 was decent here while it was a total shutout in 2015.
  24. CANSIPS now getting close to a +4C ONI peak…
×
×
  • Create New...