Now that this one is in the books, I'm curious what the consensus is for @Damage In Tolland's take on this storm. There were some high fives and "atta boy's" yesterday but was this a case of keen interpretation of model output, wish-casting, persistence forecasting or some combination of all these things? Hindsight is always 20/20 but it's hard telling, for me anyways, if someone has truly sniffed something out ahead of time or just gets lucky. He was definitely onto this and stuck to that going into go-time whereas it seemed like many (who I tended to agree with, especially due to the storm the week prior...) were on the side of this not being too impactful.
Just curious what some pertinent bullet points are for an after storm review from those with experience doing this. What was interpreted accurately and what wasn't? What did DIT see ahead of time to say this is actually going to happen? How often do those variables show up and it DOESN'T happen?