Jump to content

Winterweatherlover

Members
  • Posts

    1,142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Winterweatherlover

  1. I wish I could believe these models like the gfs and NAM. I really do but I can’t.
  2. I think the RGEM is too warm but if its right it has NYC already in the 40s when precip starts.
  3. It's possible, depends how far east the overrunning makes it.
  4. Definitely, if we had more cold and this storm track we'd just be getting a bunch of snow to ice to rain events, if we had this lack of cold and storms tracking offshore we'd be getting rain to heavy snow events.
  5. If NYC is going to get measurable snow it better be snowing by 1 pm tomorrow, if not no chance.
  6. It might be overdoing the warmth along the hudson but I'd expect it to be closer to reality than some of these other models. In all the recent storms I can remember it has done very well.
  7. Maybe it does well with inland storms and not as well with coastals? We wouldn't know since we haven't had any of the latter this winter.
  8. The WWA should be canceled for Rockland and Northern Westchester, I imagine Snowman19 would agree.
  9. I could see something like 3-5 inches just west of Middletown tomorrow but like less than an inch in Newburgh, thats just kind of how this winter has been going.
  10. It still shows accumulating snow to the north Bronx tomorrow, that model has really gotten a lot more whacky then it used to be.
  11. If the RGEM is right not unless you are well west of the Hudson.
  12. Steady as can be, this model is so good. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=rdps&p=snku_acc-imp&rh=2023012418&fh=48&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  13. I know the NAM is probably wrong, I just don't get how two models can look so different this close to an event.
  14. Honestly just laughuable differences NW of the city for a day out https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023012412&fh=84&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ne&p=snku_acc-imp&m=nam https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=rdps&p=snku_acc-imp&rh=2023012412&fh=84&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  15. I try to be open minded (not pessimistic or optimistic) I really do but everytime the RGEM has gone up against the NAM/GFS it has schooled them in this range. I'm not basing no snow in NYC on whats happened thus far this winter, i'm basing it on what models I trust most at this point. Hopefully we are miraculously surprised tomorrow.
  16. The RGEM is pretty ugly even inland tomorrow unless you have elevation, has less than an inch I87 on east up to Albany.
  17. Depends how we define score. A snowstorm no, an inch maybe.
  18. Agree nothing for tomorrow and Jan likely goes snowless for NYC. Next threat to avoid a snowless winter is 2/1 timeframe.
  19. Also have better chance of threading needle and getting snow with an active pattern rather than a dry one.
  20. Evaporational cooling probably takes it down to 35-36. Depends how heavy it comes down. If its moderate-heavy should get 0.1 at least, if it's light no chance.
  21. The RGEM has LI in the 40s the whole storm, it might be a bit too warm but I think you get the sense how this is going..... NYC 37 is the lowest it gets on the RGEM.
  22. Yea the 10:1 map has 0.1 inch but I wouldn't use that for this storm. Kuchera is nothing on the 0Z run. Window for snow is 18z to 0Z and at 18Z it's 37 degrees in NYC.
  23. Just trust the RGEM, it doesn't tease, it's been mainly all rain for NYC all along.
  24. I'm only paying attention to the RGEM anymore, every other model is horrible and flip flops every few runs.
×
×
  • Create New...