Jump to content

Winterweatherlover

Members
  • Posts

    1,582
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Winterweatherlover

  1. I hope it works out but for me it's still a caution that the RGEM has never been on board and is still not really on board. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030618&fh=24&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ne&p=sn10_acc-imp&m=rdps
  2. Narrow cutoffs stink but nice to see the areas on the wrong side of the cutoff last week maybe cashing in.
  3. Yea suppression is more likely than a cutter with the first storm. Suppression for storm 1 shouldn't be terrible as it could pave the way for storm 2 as the Euro is showing. What we seem to absolutely not want is an amped up rainstorm for storm 1.
  4. Yea I get that. I don't want to minimize it, I hope it works out for your area.
  5. One thing I don't love is even in a supposed great pattern coming up there seems to still be great lakes lows and I feel until we shake that it might be hard to get cold enough without threading the needle.
  6. I tend to think the "bullseye" with this will be 2 inches max and more likely coating to an inch. NAM over juiced as it usually is imo. Clippers usually dry out as they come east.
  7. Yep no agreement between models or even run to run agreement in the same model. Agree this won't be sorted out until at least mid week.
  8. Ukie must be surpressed for storm 1 because it hits Southern NJ coast. Models completely all over the place https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=ukmet&p=sn10_acc-imp&rh=2023030612&fh=144&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  9. My interpretation: GFS really strong with storm 1 so storm 2 is squashed to the southeast.
  10. I’m so confused by this pattern I guess the models are too.
  11. Agree like the look of offshore lows, just need one of them to trend stronger and west. Not a bad look at all this far out. I was focused on cmc, just looked at gfs and the first wave is too far west for us.
  12. I could be naive but not too worried about that with this blocking, more worried about secondary being flat/suppressed.
  13. Not necessarily but needs to be strong and close to the coast especially if it’s Miller B because that will initially pump warm air.
  14. It went from too far west to too Far East. It’s all over the place.
  15. 12z cmc is what happens if the storm is too weak and too Far East, no dynamics and rain at the coast. Well mostly too Far East this run , it’s not weak.
  16. I like him pointing out the reasons it may not snow. It’s interesting to look at all angles. Plus if he’s quiet you know we might be looking at a legit threat.
  17. I mean he’s not wrong. Going to need a fairly strong storm in March to get it done but that’s usually the case.
  18. 0.3 will tick cpk toward not breaking the record lol.
  19. If those models are correct someone in a narrow area is going to get a nice surprise but i still think those are overdone. RGEM never came on board for this.
  20. Models seem to have two waves now, one around 3/11 and a second stronger one around 3/13-3/14. A lot to sort out here.
  21. Must be rain at the immediate coast based on the snow map but doesn't really matter this far out. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030512&fh=144&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ne&p=sn10_024h-imp&m=ukmet
  22. Not really in my interpretation, this was 0Z, seems like it came west or at least is focusing on a different wave. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030500&fh=180&dpdt=&mc=&r=conus&p=prateptype-imp&m=gdps
  23. 12z CMC cuts (I don't anticipate this being the outcome but presenting all possible solutions). https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gdps&p=prateptype-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=168&r=conus&dpdt=&mc=
×
×
  • Create New...