Jump to content

Winterweatherlover

Members
  • Posts

    1,502
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Winterweatherlover

  1. One thing I don't love is even in a supposed great pattern coming up there seems to still be great lakes lows and I feel until we shake that it might be hard to get cold enough without threading the needle.
  2. I tend to think the "bullseye" with this will be 2 inches max and more likely coating to an inch. NAM over juiced as it usually is imo. Clippers usually dry out as they come east.
  3. Yep no agreement between models or even run to run agreement in the same model. Agree this won't be sorted out until at least mid week.
  4. Ukie must be surpressed for storm 1 because it hits Southern NJ coast. Models completely all over the place https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=ukmet&p=sn10_acc-imp&rh=2023030612&fh=144&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  5. My interpretation: GFS really strong with storm 1 so storm 2 is squashed to the southeast.
  6. I’m so confused by this pattern I guess the models are too.
  7. Agree like the look of offshore lows, just need one of them to trend stronger and west. Not a bad look at all this far out. I was focused on cmc, just looked at gfs and the first wave is too far west for us.
  8. I could be naive but not too worried about that with this blocking, more worried about secondary being flat/suppressed.
  9. Not necessarily but needs to be strong and close to the coast especially if it’s Miller B because that will initially pump warm air.
  10. It went from too far west to too Far East. It’s all over the place.
  11. 12z cmc is what happens if the storm is too weak and too Far East, no dynamics and rain at the coast. Well mostly too Far East this run , it’s not weak.
  12. I like him pointing out the reasons it may not snow. It’s interesting to look at all angles. Plus if he’s quiet you know we might be looking at a legit threat.
  13. I mean he’s not wrong. Going to need a fairly strong storm in March to get it done but that’s usually the case.
  14. 0.3 will tick cpk toward not breaking the record lol.
  15. If those models are correct someone in a narrow area is going to get a nice surprise but i still think those are overdone. RGEM never came on board for this.
  16. Models seem to have two waves now, one around 3/11 and a second stronger one around 3/13-3/14. A lot to sort out here.
  17. Must be rain at the immediate coast based on the snow map but doesn't really matter this far out. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030512&fh=144&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ne&p=sn10_024h-imp&m=ukmet
  18. Not really in my interpretation, this was 0Z, seems like it came west or at least is focusing on a different wave. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030500&fh=180&dpdt=&mc=&r=conus&p=prateptype-imp&m=gdps
  19. 12z CMC cuts (I don't anticipate this being the outcome but presenting all possible solutions). https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gdps&p=prateptype-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=168&r=conus&dpdt=&mc=
  20. 12Z Canadian has no interest either. I lean non event for now but am tracking it.
  21. Not the euro but a massive trend toward it. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=snku_024h-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=162&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  22. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030512&fh=147&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ne&p=prateptype_cat-imp&m=gfs https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=prateptype_cat-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=150&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc= https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=prateptype_cat-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=153&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc= Here we go
  23. Yep this is either going to weak disorganized and flat or an East coast storm, this is not going to be a raging cutter.
  24. I’m not calling for a hecs but the gfs is probably going to cave this time and last time I said other models would probably cave to gfs. I think we either end up with significant east coast storm or a flat weak wave.
×
×
  • Create New...