Jump to content

TimB

Members
  • Posts

    16,719
  • Joined

Everything posted by TimB

  1. We’re guaranteed to move up to a tie for 3rd place on this list, but hopefully it ends Sunday:
  2. I’ve been overall pretty impressed with the GFS’s ability to ferret things out this winter. We’ll see if it’s just as successful when it’s leading the charge for snow.
  3. Those forecasts come directly from TWC, I believe, and they conveniently left out the “night” portions, which say 5-8 for Sunday night at this point.
  4. It’s not a ton, but it’s enough to make people nervous who might get screwed by it.
  5. That 4-9” on the winter storm watch is a bit worrisome - I was expecting/hoping for 6-12”. If anyone wouldn’t take totals in the higher end of the range they’d be crazy, but 4-5” would sting after being in such a good position for so long. I know the dry slotting and mixing probably won’t be nailed down until much closer to the event, but east solutions are still in play (GEFS ensemble is still not great and the Ukie shifted that way overnight).
  6. This is going to look a lot like 18z, I suspect.
  7. Yeah, how likely is it really that we’ll get those insane rates? If nothing else, the 18z runs so far can at least make it easier to take the NAM with a grain of salt.
  8. RGEM is solid. 9” at PIT and still good rates through the end of the run. GFS still carrying a foot plus at PIT with 18” as close as HLG.
  9. 3k NAM is half of Alabama south at 60. Low center is on the gulf coast.
  10. 18z NAM first sign of trouble? Or just too far out to be trusted yet?
  11. Expect a dry slot even if this thing tracks favorably for us. It’s Pittsburgh.
  12. Even so, mixing or not, I think I’d settle for the foot or so of snow that it gives us.
  13. I remember Fries. He did write good discussions. Frankly, I’m not met bashing either, I think our local office does an incredible job given that they have to forecast in a region like this, where they have the northern lake effect snowbelts, the Pittsburgh area and all of our climate quirks, the mountains of PA and WV, and even eastern Ohio, which seems to be different enough from Pittsburgh to make forecasting tricky. Writing the discussion is the least of their worries, and it shows.
  14. It looks like they took the first paragraph of the previous discussion, reworded it slightly (it must have been too long), and didn’t carry any of the discussion about the Sun-Mon storm from the 3:30 version.
  15. It’s not the mixing, nor a miss east, that will get us. It’s going to be the dry slot this time.
  16. The grocery store was fairly empty (people, not shelves, other than the normal supply chain stuff we’re faced with these days) last night. Glad I went before the local media hype.
  17. Seconded, as long as “mixing issues” means sleet/zr that cuts into totals and not 6” of snow that ends as rain and wipes half of the snow out.
  18. Snow depth at PIT on the 12z GFS stays at a foot or more from the time of the storm until the end of the run. Would imagine MDT would be able to say the same with the EC storm.
  19. Wouldn’t have expected the Euro to make as drastic of a shift in just one run as it would have needed to make from 0z to 12z to give us a snowstorm. That would be too GFS-like.
×
×
  • Create New...