Hard to tell with 6-hr panels, but the ICON looks like ~15Z changeover and maybe 0.5-0.6" QPF by then. 10:1 snow maps look like a hold from 06z.
Edit - if you want consistency, the 10:1 snowfall on the ICON through 18z has been between 5 and 6" for DC for the past 7(!) runs.
It isn't necessarily whether the NAM is correct, it is that we'd hope to be narrowing the goalposts by this period. I wanted to see the NAM come back to the fold, not double down.
Minor models:
FV3 remains cold. 17-18Z changeover in DC. 0.8" QPF to that point
06z HRDPS is in the middle with a 14-15z changeover. ~0.65"
06z MPAS-HTPO is about 14z, with lighter precip ~0.4"
Another interesting divergence in the models - surface temps.
00z Monday (7pm Sunday)
HRRR: 27 DC, 20 Frederick
NAM Nest: 28 DC, 29 Frederick
RDPS: 20 DC, 17 Frederick
Euro: 27 DC, 21 Frederick
GFS: 23 DC, 18 Frederick
The 06z HRRR was able to "beat back" the mix line in the late morning period. It doesn't happen on this run, and it is more NAM-like in flying the mix line north. Not nearly as bad as the NAM though.
I'm not sure that I'd completely characterize it as a "thump", given that the HRRR is 0.05" QPF per hour from 09z to 14z, but if we do score favorable ratios it'll be a nice period.
Parent NAM still changes DC over at 12z, but at least there is a bit more precip by then. But really, we should be looking at the 3k from now to the event.
I just checked, and it is 6 consecutive 00z/12z Euro runs that have weakened the 850 low. Not massive changes, but much, much better than going the other way.