Jump to content

NorthHillsWx

Members
  • Posts

    5,790
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NorthHillsWx

  1. I think that is the most accurate snow map for this event I've seen.
  2. Sleeting in Garner at work. Just stepped outside
  3. I don't know what their Warning criteria is but the text in the watch area sounds like they are expecting 2-3 in of snow which is in line with the WWA for the Raleigh forecast area
  4. COLD NE wind is a blowing in! down to 48 and drizzly. Haven't checked the guage yet but it'll be around .25" I think.
  5. I find it kinda odd the NE part of that advisory is not a WSW. I think they meet criteria easily. For the Triangle, I agree with the WWA, but it would not surprise me to hit WSW type snows anywhere in that advisory area really. The spread is definitely high with this storm
  6. What are we thinking temps will realistically be at go-time with this one across the board? Do we think BL temps warming into the 40's are going to be an issue? Models all over the place. Living here most of my life has taught me to usually go on the high end of guidance for an event starting in the afternoon, and low-end of guidance with the event starting in the morning (assuming radiational cooling took place without full cloud cover). I know we will wet bulb but, just from my experience, it usually takes much longer than we expect or models show.
  7. If I'm chasing snow 800 miles away it will be done on an airplane and I will be going to a ski resort
  8. 2 days ago: "Temps are unequivocally not going to be an issue". I knew better: Agreed if you're only talking about seeing snow fall. For accumulations, temps are always an issue. Take the 2.8 system for example. Many areas outside of North Georgia and Oconee and Pickens counties saw snow fall with no mixing, but very minimal accumulations. Mid and upper levels were excellent so it stayed snow but temps at the ground never fully cooled below the 32-34 range and really cut into accumulations. With a system like this where precip looks to be meager at best, wasting any precip waiting for temps to drop that extra degree will significantly cut into snow accumulations. I agree the atmosphere is not an issue but the fact is the baseline temps are going to rely on evaporative cooling and rates to reach a point where accumulations are possible. It's not going to start snowing at 32 degrees and temps fall from there. I'm not going to be the "ground temp" and "sun angle" guy, but those in the upstate and charlotte areas might have something to say about that from the last system as the only efficient accumulations occurred at night or early morning (I know that's also when precip peaked with that system, but it does matter). That being said, the focus continues to be on pushing more moisture further north and letting the temp battle play out from there. That has been the limiting factor with this setup and continues to be so. The trends have been positive today from that angle. I know the take the cold first then worry about moisture approach, but to the previous post's point, cold is not an issue for it to snow with this system. It only will become an issue if we get to the stage of talking accumulations.
  9. In his/her defense, if we had 2 snowless seasons in a row, some here would be contemplating a similar drive
  10. Can't wait for the first cliff diver to step over the edge after that GFS run
  11. Haha, issuing Winter Storm Warnings the day OF the event without a Watch lol. Sounds like GSP on 2.8... I'd bet watches will be put out with the afternoon updates. They are probably waiting to decipher the 12Z data. I think that's the right call. I do think we will see watches and the NWS will become a little more aggressive with the new-found consistency pointing towards at least a moderate event...
  12. I have become too emotionally involved in tomorrow's storm for my own good. Please bring me back down to Earth, people of the sanitarium!
  13. The HRRR is a known torch. 2.8 is a perfect example.
  14. Spot on. It is the absolute best model for depicting a warm nose. That used to be the model's only use for me... One good thing about the system is it is heading more east. Large Miller A storms with a prevalent warm nose riding up the coastline do not drag down colder ML's until the precip has ended. The trajectory of this system being more east move whatever warm nose out and sets up a decent period of snow for all areas Triangle-East. At least that's how I see it as compared to normal situations where the warm nose seems to linger until only flurries are left...
  15. Anyone else impressed with the consistency of the NAM over the last 2 days and with the 2.8 event? Rock solid. Some noise but overall it has been the most steadfast model again. It used to be a model from which I expected the consistency of Clemson basketball run to run...
  16. It matches well with my thinking at present. Being close to the rain or sleet or whatever form of non-accumulating wintry precip we want to call it will be nerve wracking but it is ALWAYS where the highest accumulations set up. When in doubt, go with Climo for where the mix sets up (Somewhere in Wake county) except in this case eastern sections will benefit from the LP once it gets cranking and I think it will benefit us in the Triangle as well as it pulls away. We just may waste a little extra precip.
  17. With surface layer above freezing high sleet totals will not verify or help with accumulation, if sleet is the precip type. Takes a lot of sleet to accumulate and usually has to be below freezing for anything other than mulch accumulations. This will skew clown maps, however, in the weenie direction. My worry level about the ML's is increasing for the Triangle area and points SE but not folding due to one run of the NAM. Sticking with my calls for now!
  18. Taken Verbatim, Raleigh and points south and east should not like this run of the NAM, no matter what clown maps may show. I don't think this is a big sleet storm. I think "pink" will be more of a rain and wintry mix. No accumulations in that time period. Good news is, it's the NAM! Probably still a little too amped. Discredit at your own peril though this close to go-time. Still a decent storm regardless. NE parts of the state look to jackpot the more model runs I see.
  19. Trends for the storm: Favorable 1) Models coming together favoring the higher moisture outputs from the NAM. A mix of the NAM, GFS, and EURO yields what I'd expect and I'd think the NAM would continue to scale back somewhat while other models meet it in the middle 2) NW trend has stopped. We have the moisture. More NW movement introduces more people in the current "snow zone" to the infamous warm nose. NAM is what I would rely on heavily for where that sets up. 3) EURO came onboard Unfavorable 1) Earlier start time. Looking like for the RDU area and points west and south, start times have inched up to noon. This means less time for cold dry air to filter in before precip starts. Looking more and more like rain to start now and maybe a couple hours of it. 2) Middle of the day in late February transitions after rain do not point to efficient snow accumulations. With the chilly column (for much of central NC), I do not believe it will be particularly difficult to change to snow, like so many events are here, but this is strictly focusing on accumulations. This is all especially with wet ground and above freezing temps 3) While I believe there is enough lift to generate several heavy bands of snow, areas between these bands are going to struggle to accumulate until later in the even when temps dip below freezing. How much moisture remains at that point will be crucial for final accumulations. I'm agreeing with NWS here and think the term "white rain" will be used frequently during daylight hours tomorrow outside of the heaviest bands All this aside, this looks like a decent hit to me for Central/Eastern NC. I do not think the CLT people will be as lucky. My Updated Call: CLT- Some snow but minimal to no accumulation Triad-Roxboro- Increased what I originally thought due to more moisture and the coolest profiles. 1-2 in Triangle- Increased due to more moisture. BL Temps have become an issue due to what I stated above. I'm going with 2-3 in but this could have been a 4-6 in type storm with more cold and less rain before the snow begins. Enough flakes will seemingly fall for that. Sandhills- Temps the main issue. I'm going 1-3 in (similar to Triangle) with highest amounts N Henderson-Roanoke Rapids- Increased here to me due to more moisture and better profiles. Going with 2-4 in, increasing to the east Greenville-Rocky Mount-Williamston-Elizabeth City- Temps maybe slightly more of an issue to begin but storm gets cranking. I think this is where the band of heaviest snow sets up. I'm going with a pretty uniform 3-5 in storm with a couple of 7-8 in lollipops in there. Where the moisture meets the highest lift and the best timing for cold air and nighttime snow. I'd be surprised if a WSW isn't issued here New Bern- still thinking 1-3 in. BL issues going to be main inhibitor, as will hours of rain before the switch. I think almost all of SE NC sees flakes but amounts will taper quickly SE of Newbern. A general Tr-1 in is a good forecast for these areas.
  20. I'm not going to bicker on the storm thread but... You said "trending towards all rain" as the first frame of precip arrived. Of course, the run turned out to be an absolute hammer for much of the state. I'm not saying not to post what you see but at least wait to speak or back it up with something of substance, not just blanket statements. You're not the only one. Sorry if I come off wrong, there's just a lot of activity on here and clutter really dampens the great meteorological chat we come here for, especially as we work towards storm mode
  21. Blending the NAM, GFS, and EURO, central NC looks like a good place to be. I'm hesitant to jump on the NAM being so far north with precip but it cannot be denied that pretty much every model is caving that way. That's not a mby forecast, just an ob based on the 18z runs I've seen
×
×
  • Create New...