Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    90,911
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. This first one you posted did. He’s in Methuen now not Wilmington. It’s not worth parsing over the NAM run anyway but he’d do quite well imho even if he didn’t jackpot that run. He might not get 12”+ but probably at least 8-10.
  2. One of the few storms you would’ve done noticeably better in Methuen than Wilmington.
  3. For Kevin it could easily be an advisory 3-6” event if there’s no earlier capture...he’s interior and elevated enough that it will snow with the residual WAA stuff on the front end. This airmass isn’t as bad as Dec 5th...there’s at least some dry dewpoint drain from that high to the north. If closer to the coast with little elevation then I’d want the rates to pound more.
  4. Not necessarily. There’s plenty of storms I’ll worry more about a scraper or whiff than an amped solution. This is definitely not one of them despite seeing several weak SE solutions on the euro.
  5. Doesn’t have to move NW to get a more tucked track. Just look at 18z NAM. You just need a more defined vortmax...ULL track and vortmax track are already plenty far enough NW for a hugger type solution. It’s just a matter of capturing that sfc baroclinicity early enough.
  6. I think he was asking from our point of view further south.
  7. Jerry's turn for the jackpot? Just wait one run if you don't like it.
  8. RGEM is actually going to capture it in a good spot for eastern spots...a little different than the NAM.
  9. RGEM not as amped as 12z so far...which isn't terribly surprising since it was one of the most amped models at 12z
  10. Cold layer below the warm tongue is pretty deep for the first several hours, so I wouldn't be surprised at a pretty good sleet-fest for a time. Esp in the zone between the pike and N CT/N RI.
  11. A lot of parallels with the first Feb '83 storm (the one before the HECS)....Feb 6-7, 1983. That was a huge crush job from roughly 495 belt westward and northwest. Though it did bring some decent snows to 128 (albeit some taint)
  12. Actually looks a lot like the Feb 5, 2001 snowfall distribution
  13. You could see it early on that it would likely be good. That shortwave gets squeezed and slows everything down and allows the sfc to feed off the upper air better. It also squashes the vortmax south of SNE which is a more potent look for coastals.
  14. 18z NAM is coming in slower through 48....which is probably a good thing for a better system on 1/3-1/4
  15. That was the best H5 track we've seen on the Euro....that would prob be better for SNE (esp EASTERN AREAS!!!) than shown. I agree the crazy capture and stall is likely happening to our northeast though. I don't expect 20-30" for anyone until maybe you get up into DE ME.
  16. It was a late phase but the whole thing was much further southeast....and t ended up creating like a 700-800 mile firehose in the mid levels coming out of the east. Had 23 inches in that one in ORH. This one if it does phase and stall would happen much further north...it wouldn’t be an easterly firehose setup. It would be a rotting CCB/deformation.
  17. Eh maybe not. 84h 06z was pretty good. I thought it looked better than 06z leading up to that timeframe though.
  18. Could be a nice little sleet bomb for 3 hours here. Hopefully it starts as a couple hours of snow to at least whiten everything up good.
  19. Yes. I don’t disagree with that. Even on scenarios where the ULL is redeveloping almost overhead, interior SNE will get accumulating snow. Perhaps even a decent amount. But it won’t be the favored spot for the heaviest and longest duration snows. That would be favored further northeast in that scenario. So I think that’s the difference between and advisory type event or something much bigger.
×
×
  • Create New...