Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    91,770
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. Not until 5pm or so....and it will eventually cave. It always does in the big dogs even if it has to be dragged kicking and screaming 24 hours before the event starts.
  2. Going from wet to powdery would be bad for the trees there given the winds. Only saving grace is the Cape trees are pretty gnarly and tough from the abuse they take each year anyway.
  3. No problem...ratios are tough because you have to deal with multiple variables....also in larger storms, the weight of the snow on itself is going to limit ratios. IT's a lot easier to get a 20 to 1 fluff ratio in a 7-8" storm than it is in a 18" storm.
  4. I don't have a magic formula on how to deal with wind, but experience over the years has taught me that in higher wind storms (and temps comfortable below freezing), the ratios will tend to converge onto typical "Cold climo ratios" that you see, say, in interior NY state...which is in the 13 to 1 or 14 to 1 range.....now further inland where winds might be a little lighter, if they get under a death band, then I could see the overall ratios being more like 16 to 1 or something.
  5. Gotta love 65 knots at H7 slamming into the E coast of MA. There would probably be yellow bands on radar embedded in a dark green solid precip shield.
  6. TPV lurking though...noticed the heights are a little lower to the northeast in Quebec/Labarador....but yeah, the trough west looks more amped. Hopefully that sticks.
  7. It is the manner in which it achieves the BM position that is causing the eastward look to the precip compared to a more conventional storm.....typically storms move northeast or ENE to the BM....but this one is kind of taking a wider turn to the right and then hooking north....when it does that, the heavier WCB precip is not going to get western areas as much...it comes up through the Cape and eastern areas first and then you have to wait until the CCB backs in from the E or SE. The compactness of this storm will definitely be somethign to watch....if it's a bit wider circulation, then you will do fine with a BM track...but if it implodes a bit toward the center, then we could see an annoying dropoff in totals west of roughly ORH-IJD.
  8. You are just NW of me (I'm near the Hopkinton/Holliston line)....your fate will be very similar to mine...so you can just wait until I get worried if you need a proxy for how good it looks there. And right now, we look very good. We are potential jackpot candidates.
  9. GFS is a massive torch cutter....hopefully that mutes some. 12z GGEM looks more overrunning (can only see out to 144h though right now)
  10. No you are probably remember March 2018....there was the March 7-8, 2018 storm that was a huge paste bomb for a bunch of SNE and then Mar 13, 2018 was the monster that crushed eastern areas....but it did have a weenie band in far western CT/MA too.
  11. Yes agreed and not all the guidance agrees on how compact it is either. My gut says you get a solid storm out there, but obviously it's going to be living on the edge during these runs.
  12. I think it was the March 2017 storm where the GFS took until like 24 or 30 hours out to finally cave...it kept tracking it over the BM while the Euro and other guidance were huggers.
×
×
  • Create New...