eduggs

It also shows half the QPF as sleet (or rain - SNJ).

Synoptically it tracks with the GFS. So usually too cold. Too bad though because it's a snowy solution... right into Mon. morning.

God that's an ugly sounding for NYC. I wonder if the warm layer being between 700mb and 850mb makes it less likely to show up on 3rd party graphics for other models... maybe other models don't generate and distribute temperature data in between the more common pressure heights.

This reminds me a lot of December 16/17 2020. I don't think the public freakout was as over-the-top for that one... but then again, people didn't have the apple weather app yet I don't think.

We go through this so often. And people cover their eyes and ears beforehand and pretend it didn't happen afterwards. When the NAM shows sleet it sleets. And the extent is usually north of where the 3rd party vendor graphics show it.

What a sweet looking storm for the ALB area. Looking like 24-30 hours of snow up that way. 1"+ liquid, no mixing, great ratios. Those types of long duration, all-snow, big QPF events don't happen very often. Should be a great event for the HV too, but the wraparound shuts off a little quicker than further north.

The RRFS is snowier than the NAM for sure, but the RRFS also shifted northward with the heaviest snow and the thermals. 12z had better ratios and was a mid-HV down to near NYC jack. 18z has it up near ALB with heavy snows to the NY border. Obviously it will shift around somewhat but it's disappointing not to see a clear colder/south trend at 18z so far.

But haven't we heard this dozens of times before marginal events?... but it's almost always correct with mix lines being further north than the consensus of other guidance.

From the clown maps it looks like the City south gets more QPF as sleet than as snow.

The NAM is irritating and somehow predictable. Meaningful QPF lost to sleet and then pronounced dryslot with little lingering wraparound. It's also totally believable. We really need to see a meaningful shift south in some guidance tonight - not just holds - to give us room to think the sleet line won't zoom north Sunday afternoon.

Me too. Was still hoping for clear improvement and more breathing room.

The southern stream wave in TX sharpened up a bit again this run

If you cycle the past 6 runs or so of the NAM you can see the phase getting slightly sloppier over time. The northern stream is little by little shearing off the top of the trof instead of phasing back into the southern stream. It's still a good phase of energy and moisture, just not as extreme as a day or two ago. That trend is really helping keep the primary SLP and the bulk of precipitation south of the NY-Canada border... I'm really hoping it helps just enough to stave off too much sleet and reduce the severity of the dryslot. On the flip side, it might lead to a reduction in total QPF.

The 18z HRRR is actually not that far off from the 12z GFS in terms of northern extent of precip. shield and snow - mix line. It appears to be flattening the height field a little bit more like the GFS although not quite as much. It's definitely south of the 12z RGEM positions.

The HRRR is noticably south of the 12z NAM in terms of mix line from KY to the mid-Atl. It looks about as good as I figured it could at the end of its run.

No noteworthy changes between the 18z and 12z HRRR through 41 hours outside typical noise. 850mb heights look a tiny bit flatter.

No concerns on the 18z HRRR through 29hrs. It's a touch flatter, colder, and slower down south... exactly what I was hoping to see. But it's obviously not impacting us yet. Sure the HRRR is less reliable at range, but its 6-hr trends are sometimes useful.

Yup. ECM-AI was maybe a hair better.

Locally I've seen 1 storm of this forecast magnitude locally since 2019. Interior NNJ missed out on a few coastals in recent years. There have been very very few 6" storms around these parts over the past half decade outside of higher elevations... really hoping we can bring this one home. Weekend daylight snows are the best!

Models have been showing steadily less precipitation into Michigan and southern Ontario reflecting the lessening trof angle. That makes the synoptics more workable for us and makes it much less likely the NAM will signal a shift to a sleet bomb ending as ZR. As I've mentioned, when Saranac Lake, NY and Burlington, VT get big snows, we usually do not.

The GFS has been holding out on bringing sleet to NENJ, Westchester, and the south shore of CT. This run it finally did briefly - even viewed on the 6hr panels. But its run-to-run shifts fortunately haven't been huge. And it looked like the GFS actually made bigger moves south of us around 48hr with an initially sharper trof before shifting east later in the run... like it was playing catch up initially on the phasing but still picking up on the trend towards a more positively tilted trof angle.

Sleet to LI by 0z but still a great run CNJ north.

The GFS is joining the other guidance but not quite to the RGEM it looks like. Pretty good model agreement.

Looks like the GFS is going to be more amped/warmer than 6z at least.