Jump to content

eduggs

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,137

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by eduggs

  1. eduggs
    Probably not, but I wouldn't rule out mostly snow for your area. Looks like a little northerly surface drain north and east of the HV. If we can stave off any lower-mid-level warming from the decaying primary, I think you could do fine up there.
  2. eduggs
    The regional Canadian is warm, but still really close to a paste bomb for areas just NW of the corridor. As depicted, Walt's I-84 area is the dividing line on the CMC.
  3. eduggs
    With a primary into Rochester NY I like the Catskills for a quick hard hitting thumping. Flakes could fall much further south, but once again the large-scale synoptics don't favor our region.
  4. eduggs
    Not a lot of wiggle room on those GEFS for the metro area. The CMC looks quite a bit warmer.
  5. eduggs
    The GFS has a really nice looking sounding for near interior areas. Really steep lapse rate in the lower boudary layer. That would probably be rain at 200ft and a winter wonderland at 500ft in NENJ and the Hudson Highlands. The NAM has an above freezing layer near 800 or 850mb that would probably mean mostly rain until you got near the Poconos, far northern NJ or western Orange County. I still don't like the primary cutting off our "cold" air supply. This could be rain to pounding snow, ending as light rain or drizzle.
  6. eduggs
    Two back to back ULLs are forecast to take basically the same track from northern Mexico/west Texas to near Chicago, separated by just over 24 hours. That's kind of funky. The second tracks slightly east of the first on most guidance, but the trough axis and airmass are little improved after the first. There is a forecasted weak high pressure center in eastern Quebec/Maine early Sunday and a slight hint of damning, but once again cold is really marginal until you get into interior SNE. Still I think any slug of heavy precipitation could bring the parachutes because the forecast soundings show mostly a boundary layer issue. Let's hike to our highest local hills and hunt for the snow line.
  7. eduggs
    This looks like an elevation (800ft+) or intense banding deal for snow.
  8. eduggs
    It looks like the latest GFS still brings some wet snow to elevated areas N&W of the City, but I still don't like the ULL track heading up into NNY. The primary surface low holds on a little too long, keeping a southerly component to the flow through the low and mid-levels until late in the game. So the area appears to get dryslotted with backside precipitation limited to upstate NY and NE. I'm glad there are at least a few wintry threats to track, and this event could still be salvaged, but it needs some work.
  9. eduggs
    It's a little warm, especially early. But the rapidly deepening low makes up for it. A solution that intense is doubtful though. But that would be some seriously intense snow.
  10. eduggs
    You look pretty snowy to me based on that CMC depiction. Isothermal column pounding pasty parachutes.
  11. eduggs
    That's a ton of QPF on the CMC. Someone's getting a paste bomb if that's close to right.
  12. eduggs
    The op GFS is definitely on its own a little bit. But I don't think it's as far off as it appears at the surface. I expect the GFS to shift slightly closer to the coast with the surface low in future cycles. I just hope the mid-level low doesn't track too far north. I'd like to see it a little further south before - hopefully - closing off several isobars. I think you're in a pretty decent spot up there in Dutchess if this thing does develop.
  13. eduggs
    The CMC looks like it drops a lot of QPF all across the area. That depiction probably dumps 6"+ across elevated parts of the NW interior.
  14. eduggs
    A GFS CMC compromise solution for Sunday might look interesting for most of the area. In fact you could throw the EC, UK, and even ICON in there for good measure and the inter-model average is intriguing. Still plenty of spread on the ensembles. The initial mid-level low track might be fairly far north. But a late developing coastal low could crash the column at the last moment. Not a perfect snow setup. Maybe that's why this one feels like it's sliding under the radar.
  15. eduggs
    The new CMC is much warmer than last night's run. Still has some sleet or freezing rain to start, especially NW areas. But it's not nearly as interesting as yesterday. The follow up coastal is gone too. It looks like maybe the 0z was a blip. It's been so tough to get any momentum going lately.
  16. eduggs
    The 12z GFS still looks really ugly for Jan 1st and 2nd. The might be some ice in that solution for favored northern locations, but the warm push is too strong. There does appear to be some room for a better phase for the follow up coastal system on the 3rd and 4th. This system doesn't have much cold air to work with either, but it could be enough with a slightly more wrapped up mid level low.
  17. eduggs
    Yeah you could describe it that way. But models don't know or care what the NAO or PNA are. Models just represent the physics. Climate indices are a way of simplifying and quantifying complex atmospheric states for easier human understanding. They aren't tangible things that have causal effects on anything.
  18. eduggs
    Great CMC run. No deep cold, no major snow events, and complex shortwave interactions that will likely keep changing, but it's the best midrange run in a while!
  19. eduggs
    The brutal stretch continues with virtually no trackable wintry threats for the foreseeable future. It's been almost 2 weeks of unfavorable model runs across the full suite since a few days before the December 17 event. Hopefully the wait will make it sweeter when the snow tracking resumes.
  20. eduggs
    The problem with the 0z GFS is that after the likely near miss at day 6 there's nothing in the hopper for the rest of the run.
  21. eduggs
    I don't buy this. Local snowcover definitely decreases surface temperatures, especially during clear, windless nights. So weather models, especially back in the early 90s, might have over-estimated temperatures when there was snowcover. It might also shift marginal wintry situations slightly colder, although this is questionable. But I believe that any significant impact of regional snowcover on synoptic scale track/features is anecdotal and not scientifically well supported.
  22. eduggs
    Great run for northern half of NE. Past few runs have been moving in that direction. I hope the trend continues. I love the lagging and separation of the s/w deep down in TX from the northern stream day 4.5. But I'd like to see a little less phasing with the follow up trof swinging through the mountain west right behind it. I still think this is probably a Lakes cutter. But this makes it slightly more interesting to track.
  23. eduggs
    No. I think any effect on synoptic level features is marginal. To the degree that snowcover affects large-scale patterns, it is hemispheric snow cover not regional snowcover that drives the influence.
  24. eduggs
    That's a nice compilation of the past. But it doesn't tell us a whole lot about the future. We can try to make inferences to correlate, for example, December with the entire season, but we'd be on really shaky statistical ground.
  25. eduggs
    Exactly my point. If you want to make predictions regarding weather likelihoods based on climatological indices, you have to be precise about the locations of both the weather and the indices in question. A "blocky" pattern is a very broad statement that can have a wide range of implications for the northeast US.
×
×
  • Create New...