Jump to content

Normandy

Members
  • Posts

    780
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Normandy

  1. Take it FWIW, but the system that will cause these events crashed into California yesterday and Monday….and in my 15 years living in Los Angeles it was the strongest system I’ve experienced.  Some highlights:

    - 102 mph wind gust in Valencia, CA

    - confirmed tornado in Montebello, CA (strongest observed in the Los Angeles area since 1983).  Rating still TBD but will likely be assigned an EF-0 or EF-1 based on damage produced 

    - several 60-90 mph wind gusts in San Francisco due to a bomb cyclone that developed at the center of the low pressure system 

    I got my eyes on this one

     

    • Like 1
  2. Its not as simple as a Cat 1 can cause this much surge.  This was not an ordinary Category 1 storm.  it was extremely large, and on top of that was interacting with a very strong high pressure system.  Those two elements created a strong pressure gradient that delivered a 200 mile swatch of NW 50-60 MPH winds that drove insane amounts of water into the FL coast.  A similar Cat 1 storm (Katrina) was in a similar situation and evolved much differently as a storm with respect to storm surge.  There have been several hurricanes that have greatly overperformed their storm surge values due to extreme large fetch of winds (Ike, Nicole, Sandy, etc). 

    • Like 3
  3. 43 minutes ago, Roger Smith said:

    As to Nicole not being a 'cane at landfall, probably true near the center, but if you noted that report from the space center further north (100 mph gusts above the surface), I think what happened was that strongest winds decoupled from the core when the storm straddled the coast, and were ejected north. So there was a hurricane aspect to the landfall, but very non-classical as to location of that remnant. How are storm surge outcomes north of the Cape? That might be another aspect that was better anticipated from hurricane Nicole than TS Nicole designations. It's sort of like the Sandy landfall in that what the storm was named could mislead some vulnerable coastal residents, in hindsight many thought that Sandy should have been retained as a hurricane to landfall. Some in storm surge situations might have (wrongly) surmised that Sandy wasn't even a hurricane any more, and let their guard down. This was widely discussed IIRC in the days after landfall. Also a storm with a 16' storm surge and 90 mph wind gusts could safely be called a hurricane for a few extra hours. 

    This doesn't make any sense.  Having 100 MPH flight level winds does not make a storm a hurricane.  The lack of sustained 60+ MPH winds anywhere near the coast suggests this did not have 75 MPH sustained surface winds.  It is possible for a storm to be stronger aloft and weaker at the surface.  It is also possible for a storm to have weaker flight level winds and have the winds mix down better.  Nothing I am saying here downplays Nicole as a storm.

  4. Category 3 would be an extreme overperform I think.  That being said, I think the NW fetch of winds is going to cause tons of beach erosion and surge damage on the E coast of Florida.  Holding firm low end Cat 2, landfall between WPB and FL.

     

  5. Two things I am watching with this storm:

    1) The structure is already such that it seems to be on the cusp of Hurricane intensity.  I am wondering if intensity wise models are busting low

    2) The motions of such storms under strong High pressure systems tend to trend more south than modeled (Ike, Andrew, Katrina, etc). 

    If i were to make a call based on the state of the storm now and the two thoughts above:  I say just north of Miami for landfall with Category 2 intensity.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...