Jump to content

Normandy

Members
  • Posts

    732
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Normandy

  1. Early thoughts: vorticity seems to be setting up further east and north from the coast, leading me to think we get a stronger landfall out of this as interaction with the Yucatán might be limited. I like the idea of a hurricane strike out of this. Somewhere on the FL peninsula North of Miami.
  2. There is certainly an argument for hurricane intensity at landfall based on obs and radar data. It was wrapping up in a VERY rapid manner at landfall
  3. I would watch the area north of Panama right now. Tons of convection and a lot of surface convergence. It appears this might be a piece of energy that was shed westward out of franklins intense convective bursts yesterday and last night
  4. I’m not certain a center reforms. A new burst has occurred where recon currently fixed it (SE of the previous location). Track implications are certain with this wild motion. Interesting to watch unfold
  5. How was Gert a joke? It’s had an LLC for days and has been producing consistent convection. I get that y’all want your El Niño numbers but science is science guys.
  6. Starting to get some orographic enhancement from the San Bernardino mountains. Solid band of rain me of LA and E if LA
  7. here in so cal there have been essentially zero winds. The gradient of the storm is such that the SW US gets the TS winds as stated above
  8. Felt the earthquake was a solid shake. Main show is starting in Los Angeles. Big band starting to establish itself over the western parts of the city
  9. In Los Angeles we are already getting good rains with the band ahead of the low. We are currently in a lull as we are in the space between the two competing lows, but as Hillary draws closer winds will turn offshore and I expect heavy training bands to set up tonight in advance of the center.
  10. Sleeper system potentially considering its current organizational trend. Like the idea of a strong TS landfall out of this
  11. The NHC’s lack of propensity to name obvious tropical cyclones is starting to get annoying. It took them far too long to name Emily and the day before TD 6. Just because it’s in the open ocean doesn’t mean you don’t initiate advisories when it’s an obvious TC
  12. Seems like they found a steady state system based on the latest NHC update. Either way weakening should start soon. Already seeing signs on the NW side
  13. It’s hard to get away from run off areas because humans build near and around them (see the LA river for example). it can’t be understated that this is a big hydro threat to so cal and the SW
  14. The recon passes thus far show a very broad wind field and loose gradient around the center, which makes sense considering the storm is in the process of undergoing an ERC. Further strengthening would be tough since it’s already pretty deep of a system and broad, however the storm is very well ventilated aloft and is drawing moisture from the south and Baja of California. Therefore I wouldn’t rule it out. bottom line is the broad windfield will make it such that TS winds and heavy rains will arrive well before the center will. There won’t be time for this to spin down because of cold waters as impacts will be felt while the center is still 300 (or more) miles south.
  15. depending on how the track plays out, this could be a hydro disaster for Los angeles. If it comes in farther west and puts 6 inches of rain down in one day……I’m not even sure the Los Angeles river would stay in its banks. Crazy times.
  16. To answer your question bluntly: there is no comparison between a TC and our winter storms. The strongest winter storms put down 30 sustained with gusts in the 60’s. Maybe 2 inches of rain. A direct tc strike puts a little more wind and double to the rain. The second part is what will be devastating. The wind we can deal with
  17. That’s big deal if verified. The rain alone is enough to be record setting. The wind is the cherry on top. I’m officially on alert as a resident of LA
  18. There might need to be serious convos about a tropical cyclone strike on so cal
  19. If the GFS is to be believed, we see three named storms at least before august ends. Other model consensus also coming into agreement. The bell has been rung!
  20. Agree the pot is getting hot and storms are going to form soon. Not seeing an august shut out at all based on current modeling. Even a look at satellite one can see very discernible waves / future lows in the gulf and near the Bahamas.
  21. My running theory is that as waters warm and stay warm later into the winter months, nor’easters will start to become more powerful and damaging (basically superstorm Sandy’s become more frequent) . Fun speculation during these dog days of hurricane summer
  22. It’s less about name wasting and more about consistency. 97L to my untrained eye looks like more than a frontal low. I’ve seen stuff like this named before. Very deep convection and obvious LLC.
  23. People agree with the NHC in this? That looks like a TC to me
  24. Not sure why Don hasn’t been upgraded yet. I get it’s not a threat to land but a hurricane is a hurricane
×
×
  • Create New...