Jump to content

pazzo83

Members
  • Posts

    30,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pazzo83

  1. lol and the urban core is 38-41F at 10pm in mid January. It's just not what it was....
  2. this subforum handles the disappointment remarkably well. the meltdowns I remember from the NYC forum were ridiculous (which is probably why we see some NYC-area posters here).
  3. i'd kill to be in Sierras rn. I can't even fathom the quantity of snow they are getting.
  4. I think we'll get sub 32 here in upper NW DC overnight tonight. But DCA might not - still hanging in the upper 30s.
  5. Yeah I lived in NYC from 2010-2018, and really there was one bad winter in that stretch (in terms of little snow) - 2011-12. 15/16 would've been bad had it not been for the January storm that year (and the fluke -1F reading on Valentine's day, possibly the last time Manhattan will ever dip below zero lol). But yeah it's been a struggle here.
  6. Frankly, I think this best captures the snow-lover's dilemma in this area - for the most part, we are f'd. The base state is becoming increasingly hostile to non-negligible likelihood significant snow events.
  7. Temp and dewpoint rising here in Tenley - 65/58 right now.
  8. i wouldn't be surprised if we hold in the low-mid 60s tonight.
  9. We had temps in the 80s in January (in the Shenandoah Valley) that year.
  10. I feel like NYC did that over approximately that period back in 2011. It was pretty epic.
  11. mid 50s at midnight on Dec 30/31. Sure.
  12. Some pretty wild local microclimate stuff going on rn: I'm at 45F in Tenleytown, a couple blocks off of Wisc Ave (so close enough to feel some effect from that built environment). It's in the mid-upper 30s just a few blocks away (further into AU Park). It's 37 at DCA.
  13. River is def f'ing with DCA obs rn. I'm at 46F in Tenleytown, DCA down to 39F.
  14. isn't your independent variable here time, so that is what you are using to try to explain the variance in your observed data (snowfall)? Let's ignore the fact that running a simple linear regression on a time series, especially when there is a cyclical component here (thus the observations are not all IID), is problematic. But if you are trying to see if a warming base state would be used, you'd think you'd include something reflecting that in your analysis (and not just time).
  15. you can't just run a simple linear regression on this time series because the observations aren't IID (independent and identically distributed), so your raw R-squared value isn't really useful. We know that snowfall here is cyclical.
  16. Don S was showing similar data regarding NYC.
  17. i caught the third period - didn't seem like the Rangers even had any good chances.
  18. Folks have tried to show you this is just objectively false in a variety of ways.
  19. that's true - once your sample size is big enough.
  20. i mean there is some statistical validity to saying "we're due" - absolutely.
  21. that's a great point - I guess you'd model it on some sort of distribution related to the exponential (beta maybe?)?
  22. yeah it's tough. Even going on a year interval, DC snowfall has a ton of year-to-year variance given its location. Another interesting thing to look at would be to see the frequency of 3"+, 6"+ and 12"+ events per year.
  23. yep this is what I was always taught - you need a sample size of around 30. I think it's interesting the median is decreasing but the std deviation is increasing. That would suggest that while overall snowfall is trending down just a bit, we are dealing with more all or nothing type scenarios (which would make sense if we are dealing with an underlying state of bigger storms but a warming atmosphere (meaning generally less snow here)).
×
×
  • Create New...