Maestrobjwa

I figured he was on it...that doctor earlier didn't have the best poker faced when the reporters pressed him about it, lol

Yep...goin' super saiyan right up to landfall...I wonder what's caused that phenomenon this year?

While I pray that the President recovers and doesn't have any serious complications...this theme is all I could think about when I first heard about his diagnosis, lol

CORRECT! Yep, she mastered the lesson Love that!

Ya really oughta learn your Greek alphabet I believe it's Gamma

FORTE Mappy! FORTE!! Was this the music unit?

Yeah I hear your point there...just splitting hairs a little

Not so much at BWI...looks like we got 14", 1.8", and then 8"...so still no back-to-back

Never said we were due for average...6 inches is still below average or median, lol But just speaking to having two 1-inch winters in a row has never happened, that's all. So "better" in a sense of not being in the bottom barrel of 2 inches...

Well, it doesn't HAVE to be...but it would be a historical anomaly...at least at BWI. Looking up and down the record, there have never been two consecutive winters where we got less than 2 inches. That would be a new historic level of fail--even for here--if that happened. Following our lowest winters, there was always an uptick of some sort...would often be like 6-8 inches, and one time 17", and once was above average with 24 inches (1992-93) So definitely no history of it...and let's hope things stay that way

Wait...what...did you just hop in a time machine?

Another symptom of being psyched out tonight...

Ravens O has to learn how to come from behind...that kind of toughness is what makes playoff teams, imo

I'm not sure this is the definition of a trap game...lol Trap game is when you look past a team and they get ya...this would just be a plain ol' loss if we don't come back

Ya know...I sometimes wonder if folks today would be using that same logic back in 1918...I could see it now: "Oh, the fatality rate is ONLY 3%! 97% of people are fine!" (I know the percentages aren't the same, but you get my drift, lol)

Wait which part if 2010 were you referring to? The actual winter of 2009-10, or the December 2010 (boxing day) storm?

Man are you tryin' activate traumatic memories around here?? It's nearly ten years later and that's still too soon dude, lol

Lol Hey, you know me...if there has to be snow suffering..."All together now" And hey, better to get these bad look LR forecasts now instead of getting a head-fake...so that if there's a surprise, AWESOME! But if not...the expectations are low to begin with, lol

At least we know we can't do worse than that winter...lol (because we just had the same total last winter!l

Hey the WDI was my idea! (or at least I thought it was...lol)

But it only helped down here at the end of January. Remember we got gipped in December 2010, lol

A few? Thought '96 was the only one, lol

I mean...just taking a more plain,, commonsense language approach here...doesn't "active" mean, well...a lot of activity? So on a basic linguistic level of definition...isn't the number of storms enough to verify as such? Lol Was the prediction "hyperactive AND strong"? If not, then technically...it verifies

Was that why we were able to pull off Commutagedon (late Jan 2011) down here?

Uh...can we even say that yet? Isn't this thing supposed to be meandering for several days before landfall?