Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    72,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. .44" QPF here.....that's probably a good 6".
  2. May be prudent to take a compromise of 10:1 and Kuctchie...
  3. I would have gone off of the deep end if I were up there....its been awful.
  4. Smidge north of 06z....sell the drunk Candien and Brit.
  5. The mini 2015 stuff is dumb....JMHO. If we get a HECS this weekend, then entertain it....but 'cmon. Was TS Irene a mini '38? Feb 1994 is pretty reasonable, but I think we need to see more to conjure up the 2015 memory.
  6. Yea, Taunton is fine....I just should have had it a bit further north than I did.
  7. Yea, nice storm to learn from, regardless.....which is the point of all of this, at the end of the day. Thanks.
  8. I just screwed up TBH....no other reason. I know better, and made a rookie mistake.
  9. Even though most of us know this, its important to remain mindful of it because I did not, which caused me to miss that band to the NW.....extending SW from Boston.
  10. Wanted to share this great learning opportunity because it ruined what would have otherwise been an exemplary forecast. Its easy to forget that H7 fronto is simply a snapshot within the atmosphere, and that the coveted cross hair sig usually aligns with the SGZ region to the NW of max H7 fronto, since it slants NW to SE throughout the column with heights....as does low pressure (unless it is stacked). Super Bowl Sunday Snowfall Verification Here is the Final Call issued on Saturday, as a point of reference: versus reality: A Case of Misdiagnosed Frontogenesis The forecast was generally accurate, however, there was one glaring oversight that detracts a great deal from the overall forecast because involves the very heaviest band. The heaviest band of 8-12" extending from southwest of Boston down through northwest RI and NE CT was the result of an intense area of frontogensis that was misdiagnosed. Although the forecast did incorporate this: What was neglected was the fact that the band of heavy snow usually extends to the northwest of maximum area of 700mb frontogenesis due to the way that it is slanted vertically throughout the atmospheric column, including the snow growth region. Thus the heaviest band of snowfall should have extended just to the north of the highlighted area of frontogenesis, which is precisely where the band happen to align. The fact that this band extended further to the northwest than forecast entailed that these very heavy snows also fell into slightly colder air, which resulted in a narrow band of 8-12", whereas the forecast 4-8" fell further to the south. This was a very large mistake that resulted in 3-6" being forecasted for that swath of real estate that was most heavily impacted with 8-12" in a very short amount of time. Thus the overall grade still suffers, despite an otherwise nearly flawless forecast. Final Grade: C
  11. Congrats on getting the Monday event on Sunday.
×
×
  • Create New...