Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    72,810
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. Right...its fine to disagree; I'm just clarifying my case. I will admit, my affinity for large events skews my grades....conversely, I am lower on years like 1993-1994 and 2013-2014 than most.
  2. Its also about how you arrived at the temps...I mean, after the Grinch, we had virtually no torches. It doesn't matter to me if you achieve positive anomalies by making into the 20s at night instead of teens. I'd actually prefer it, since I have to venture out in the AM.
  3. Right....I guess its dependent on personal scale. D for me is last year....awful winter, but a great event. F would be like 2001-2002 or 2011-2012 (I got screwed in halloween deal). I love the big events, so tough for me to fail a season when those are dished out.....if you are going to fail due to above avg temps, it may be time to implement a curve.
  4. That seems low to me...we had one storm well over a foot, one near a foot and over a month of solid pack. Solidly below avg snowfall, but not ratter. C- fits for me.
  5. That would fit the season, so it would not surprise me, but I think north of there....ORH through NE MA/SE NH.
  6. Completely agree...this is why I liked it qualitatively speaking.
  7. People are neglecting the fact that there is also northern assist reviving the southern decay late in the game.
  8. No. I like the placement of the higher amounts, thus qualitatively....I think the amounts may be a but high, which is a quantitative issue.
  9. Yes....EURO, as well. My point all along. Believe me, if I thought I was porked, I would not hesitate to admit that. Would it surprise me if it did end up like shit here, not at all, but I like the look of guidance at present. Forget the QPF gradient.
  10. I was going to say that, but it would sound better coming from you.
×
×
  • Create New...