40/70 Benchmark

Okay, I agree CC is enhancing this..I thought you were implying that the Aleutian ridge has increased more than ambient heights. My only conention regarding the last part is I still think the +NAO and +WPO are playng a significant role in the low snowfall, but I don't argue that the stronger jet is having some influence as well. But it is has been a shitty pattern, regardless....+NAO/+WPO has never ended well for the east coast snow enthusiast.

Heights are rising everywhere due to CC....not sure what that proves, as it isn't specific to the Aleutian ridge.

Yea, because there are some extremely high peaks in the northern plains....

1998 is when the multidecadal PDO cycle flipped negative, so makes sense...probably augmented by CC (west Pac warm pool), too.

We must be turning into a tropical rain forest this decade.

It was also evident in Chuck's correlation maps, too....+NAO signal peaked 2 years post max...so I think we are porked with respect to the polar domain for the next couple of winters. Its not a death knell, as there are ways around that, but it certainly makes the path to a good winter more elusive.

This implies that winter 2025-2026 and 2026-2027 will be more favorable for a stronger polar vortex than last winter, which is also consistent with other recent studies of seal level pressure patterns that revealed a +NAO pattern lagging solar max by approximately 2-4 years.

Traditionally, research correlated high levels of solar activity near solar max, as was the case for winter 2024-2025, to a stronger polar vortex and thus milder winters for much of North America and Europe. There are a multitude of theories as to why this is the case, however, most of these theories cite drivers such as UV radiation and total solar radiation (TSI), which closely mirror sunspot activity, as responsible for increasing ozone levels and temperature in the equatorial stratosphere. This warmer tropical stratosphere then results in a stronger latitudinal gradient and a cooler polar stratosphere (stronger polar vortex) via a modulated Brewer-Dobson cycle. The issue with these theories is that the peak levels of the aforementioned potential drivers of the solar-stratosphere connection coincide with solar max. And most recent research cites stronger drivers that do not coincide with solar max, such as geomagnetic energy and solar winds, which peak during solar flux or, about one year after solar max in terms of peak UV and TSI . (Maliniemi et al, 2014). Malimiemi et al theorize that geomagnetic energy makes its way into the polar region via the process of energetic particle precipitation, which then produces nitrogen oxides in the the upper atmosphere that have a protracted period of time to descend downward and increase ozone during the polar winter in the absence of any sunlight, which cools the stratosphere and strengthens the PV. This more closely corroborates both with other recent research, which cites drivers that do not peak at solar max as defined by UV and TSI (geomagnetic energy peaks approximately one year after solar max), as well as the research of Malimiemi et al (2014), which found that the declining phase of the sunspot cycle remarkably consistently produces the spacial pattern of surface temperature anomalies related to the positive NAO during the last 13 solar cycles" (Maliniemi et al, 2014). This makes sense since the geomagnetic energy peak that Maliniemi et al cite as the main driver behind the connection between the solar cycle and polar domain lags solar max as defined by UV, TSI and sunspots by approximately one year, which is during the declining phase that so strongly correlates with the +NAO response in their research.

Descending is worse than solar max for the NAO, so that isn't going to help....not saying that you were implying it would....just as an addendum.

Yea, that is resonable, although I have not closed the door on a weak warm ENSO episode...albeit looking less likely than it was a couple months ago.

I interpret that as only really having much utility at all for February, which isn't much of a news flash that February will have shitty climo if we repeat cool ENSO. I guess I don't interpret this as being as telling as you and Chris do. But like I said, with you lock-step on the NAO. That said, I won't be shocked if next season is RNA....so not necessarily arguing against that. I do think we are in for more PNA moving forward, though....regardless of what happens next year.

Yea, I think once we get beyond 2026, it becomes less hostile for -NAO, but +NAO still favored until we hit the min early next decade. The ascending portion of the cycle is best for -NAO.

I'm pretty pessimistic for the NAO the next few years....descending solar sucks. Only caveat being is if we hang near solar max for awhile, maybe we can stave of the dispersing of the geomagnetic particles by the solar wind, which is what porks the NAO.

I mean, I certainly won't be stunned if next winter is -PNA....all I mean is the days of troughs down to the baja in the seasonal mean are gone for awhile. I think last season was a sign of change....maybe it's a one step forward, two steps backward (next year), but times are changing.

Happy belated freakday!

I think if you look back throughout history, you won't find many blockbuster seasons on the east coast with a strongly +WPO/NAO, regardless of whether or not it was prohibitively warm in the mean. I have found zero dating back to 1948 in fact, so this isn't a novel concept. All of these rules you are treating as fact are still speculative and you are operating as if they are fact. I know you will find data to support your theories and contend that its fact, but the reality is that any inference beyond the fact that the climate is warming is still specualtive at this point.

Okay, I didn't realize you were connecting it to the mismatch research...all you said was +PNA December. But I still don't see the significance relative to next season. I would have to say just based on sheer odds given the warming trend, you are probably right with respect to it not being a cold, but I agree that snowfall is a lot more dubious. If we got an identical pattern next season, but flipped the WPO and NAO negative, then it would be significantly snowier. I am all for keeping an open mind in relation to the influence of CC, but not at the expense of ignoring traditional teleconnections. Many of those seasons you listed simply had better patterns. 1995 had an ideal pattern in all respects....2000-2001 had a negative NAO, in 2018 the SSW took place one month earlier, so it didn't take until March to affect the pattern and flip the polar domain more favorable, and 2020-2021 had a -NAO, even though it wasn't excessively so.

I only had a 1'....stuck in subsidence.

It was def. a really good winter, but probably outside of my top 5...especially considering how I badly I got porked in PD II.

I don't really see the significance of that...February 2000 had a very strong +PNA like this one (calculation), so why don't we consider the winter following that? Only Bluewave could reframe a shift towards +PNA after the most prominent several year stretch of RNA on record as a negative for winter.

I'm not sure...I'm speculating. I never said every season has been +NAO, but as you stated...the trend has been strongly in favor of +NAO.

Eh...depends on perspective. I'd rake 2000-2001 over 2002-2003, and I think many in the mid atl would take 2009-2010.

I just got brushed with some showers here...just west of me. .03"