I mean it’s semantics at the end of the day and they have to cut off somewhere. The main thing is the public is informed either way whether you call it an advisory or warning. An inch or two difference in projection is all that’s different. Never understood why people cared so much about that - if you’re in the borderline of warning vs advisory you clearly know it could go either way.
Yeah he has 6-10 for a large area, very bullish when even the models showing the most snow, show it in a relatively confined area. I think some get 6+ but the wide swath he has is surprising to me.
And could very well be close to the solution. I’m Much less confident in a 4+ storm than I was last yesterday at this time but 3-5 would be excellent still
Not sure where you are but that’s reasonable, I’m on the 3-6 train for most, LHV will do best. Would be a ton of fun for the day after Christmas if we can get 3-6
I’m more worried about QPF more than the temperature profile for my area. It’s a very thin band of heavier precip on almost all models - and rates will play a factor with marginal temps. 3-6” is my final call for MBY and much of the NYC metro.