Jump to content

Boston Bulldog

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    650
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Boston Bulldog

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    OWD
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Boston, MA

Recent Profile Visitors

5,223 profile views
  1. Yeah the northerly shear is pretty apparent with the restricted outflow on the northern part of the circulation. Compare the extent of outflow on the north side to the south side, huge difference.
  2. Yep, NHC noted another double wind maxima in the 5am discussion
  3. This is trochoidal wobbling of the core, as of right now the eye is deviating back to the NW. The greater motion of the storm is as forecast
  4. While the GFS’s initialization was egregiously high, in a storm with a small intense inner core like this, it will always be playing catchup. Global models simply do not have the granular resolution to initialize a small core correctly, especially in a genuinely extreme RI scenario. Their resolution is far too coarse. Only telescoping models like HAFS have the ability to initialize a storm with Erin’s structure correctly
  5. Erin is about to put on a show.
  6. I don’t think the dual blob structure is going to preclude Erin’s RI. The southerly mass of thunderstorms should either dissipate or form into a curved band. Even if it doesn’t, we’ve seen powerful hurricanes with a second convective mass such as Matthew. Honestly Matthew was a fascinating storm, I’m sure there are great papers discussing its structure. Not sure what caused it Very impressed with Erin’s gigantic ventilation right now, the anticyclonic outflow is sprawling across all quadrants
  7. Erin getting “the look” now. Lots of dry air nearby to potentially slow this trend, but she’s looking ready to take off. Rotating CBs in the eyewall are a dead giveaway. I believe data says the eye is a bit bigger than the pinhole it looks to be on satellite, but IR is looking fierce now
  8. Bermuda is very well protected by cliffs from the south, also it’s a relatively hilly island. Incredible building codes too. Honestly hurricanes are rarely a big deal there
  9. I would strongly advise against using telescoping hurricane models, such as HAFS, or the now depreciated HWRF model, until an actual system has formed. These models will key in on spurious or hallucinated rotation to “justify” kicking off the telescoped run, thus will almost always be extremely overdeveloped for nascent systems. Not saying it’s not right, but the odds are stacked against that run, especially for a depreciated model like HWRF
  10. Thanks for sharing, you reminded me of the Landsea paper on the Sahel Monsoon, great point!
  11. Lots of talk nationally of what may constitute a recession indicator for our economy. Looking around here, seeing some recession indicators for tropical weather comprehension, weather model fluency, and the understanding of the relationship between time and numerical weather prediction. Specifically 6 threads since Chantal, and only a 50mph fish storm in the subtropics to show for it. What are we doing here? I guess the inactive period truly was inactive, despite loud opposition. Might be controversial, but I don’t care what’s over Chad right now.
  12. Amazing news. SSMIS and similar polar-orbiting scans aren’t perfect, but they are the best Hurricane inner core analysis tool outside of in-situ observations and radar.
  13. After 4 years braving the frozen wasteland of upstate NY, and the tropical island of Manhattan, I am returning to Boston to join the fight against KBOS snowfall observations. Excited to be providing a new data point from just south of the Pru to help give a more accurate understanding of just how much snow actually fell in Boston
  14. One final comment on the subject, just search “Humberto” in the forum search bar and tell me which two posters show up the most
  15. My confidence is steadily growing that Barry Stanton GBP is CurlyHeadedBarrett’s (last year’s bizarre spammer) new account. The frequent abbreviations and copy-pasting of content from elsewhere as a form of bastardized “analysis” is uncanny. The first 3 posts in the entire thread are an excellent microcosm. Regardless, it makes the thread nearly unreadable. On topics that matter, still nothing of note for the Atlantic for a while
×
×
  • Create New...