FXWX

Great job on the roads... lol

I had bet on best shot at 4" in northern Litchfield county with my area nudging 3"... Definitely over performed...

Total for the day right now is 5.0; elevation ~1,200'

An additional 3 here in the last 2 hours... puking snow

Your area looked like the best shot for 4" in CT... sitting at 3" in Burlington with moderate snow...

They are... solid in Burlington with 3 on the ground

There's nothing wrong with fantasizing while watching weather porn! At least that's what my therapist says.

Roll cloud action in Burlington CT! PXL_20260108_181252868.RAW-02.ORIGINAL.dng

There certainly was! It was fine to discuss the potential as long it was it was kept in the perspective of a long range modeling prediction, and not one that was a lock to happen. And yes, 40's, 50's and even a 60 degree highs were chatted about by many folks. Why deny it... It was discussed and now reality appears to be setting that the high end warming was way overdone... Just another reason to take long lead modeling outcomes with many grains of salt. Fun to chat about but taking it verbatim will often get you burned.

Wonderful... I may need one soon

Good luck Steve... How was your recovery / PT from your first knee op? I hear it can be tough?

Thanks Tip... I fully understand the spacing issue with respect to the isohypses controlling the overall speed; the tighter the speed gradient (so to speak) the faster the flow; also I get the suppression process. What I was inquiring about is do you just scan the isohypses spacing, or do you look for a specific gradient value, if you get my drift? Have you come across any papers discussing the increasing speed / shear issue; compared to years or decades ago?

Hey Tip... Happy NY... When you say "a speed surplus problem on GFS" how are you determining that?

Couple appears off the table...

Costed up here...