Jump to content

TauntonBlizzard2013

Members
  • Posts

    33,631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TauntonBlizzard2013

  1. There are also some Mets with hesitation on bigger totals, are we ignoring that? It’s okay to disagree. I want to see a more defined secondary development before I buy big totals. Others are free to think differently, and then we reconvene after the event to see what happened.
  2. I think that’s the upper bound solution. Prolific overrunning followed by a defined, developing costal with CCB action in eastern areas. That is how someone scores 20. Hope it’s right, but that’s looking less likely after 12z IMO
  3. I think the trend at 12z, minus the Canadian, was decidedly less potential CCB influence from another developing low pressure. I think that’s the key. And if we don’t get that, you have a hard time reaching big totals. Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t we normally see huge ratios in a more traditional coastal? I’m not sure in this type of setup you are going to get 15+:1 ratios. However, even an inch of water at 12-13:1 is close to a foot of snow.
  4. Watch out, you might catch shit for this lol. But I agree. I’m selling any secondary involvement. I’d guess this ends up a pretty uniform 6-10” spot 12
  5. Obviously if we get a CCB assist in the second half, all bets are off. I think mid sized was a bad choice of words, probably should have just said, not upper echelon
  6. I didn’t know not jumping immediately to a double digit floor was a bad thing lol. Just trying to be realistic
  7. Actually develops the storm in time for a CCB assist in eastern ma. 1.5 qpf south of boston
  8. I’d say most solutions have been closer to 10 if you toss the out of control Kuchera maps
  9. I think some folks are overselling this thing a bit. Obviously, these are great solutions and everyone would take. It’s certainly not high end though? As modeled. A nice, mid sized snowstorm.
  10. It pretty much is on the gfs and icon. That definitely puts a ceiling on this. Not that it won’t be good
  11. 18z Sunday start and still snowing at 06z Tuesday in eastern ma. When was the last time a snow event was flying out of here in 4-6 hours?
  12. 1.25” qpf across most of SNE. if ratios are a little better than 10:1, that’s a solid 10-15”
  13. CMC is a little slower than the gfs, but end result will be better
  14. I think many would, but there has been a lot of talk about high end potential. 8-14” is a great system. It’s not a KU, nor is it highly anomalous
  15. Icon 10:1 is 5-10”. Not sure why I got bunned for floating the idea that this is what we could see. Maybe it’s more; I don’t know; but it’s definitely in play
  16. Icon isn’t bad, still feel like it leaves a lot on the table.
  17. I don’t disagree, but is that likely? 10-150 would be high end overrunning and then with no coastal assist? Im not downplaying it, but I’d be hesitant to forecast double digits at the moment. Still a lot to iron out
  18. Decent trends overnight. we’re going to need some secondary development to truly make this substantial system, IMO. Without that, you’re looking at a ceiling of like 5-10” as opposed to 10-20”
×
×
  • Create New...