Jump to content

DDweatherman

Members
  • Posts

    6,038
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DDweatherman

  1. @psuhoffmancan you PM me it just in case I don’t have the most current
  2. Do we just want to open a thread so you can include the zoom creds there? (then re use as necessary for others)
  3. A close off and vertically stacked system would help slow it down some (kinda like what the 12z euro did)
  4. I have my reservation there too, I get the energy redevelopment. @WinterWxLuvr best post of the day
  5. Trust me, I want this one to happen for us, so let the beer commence. I get it though, these models can throw us all for a loop. 18z GFS is a prime example. If you read a lot of the folks posts coming up to the prime frames, you'd think jaws was coming. Surface didn't turn out and by hr 84 the trough was a bit broad, even though it was night and day from the past few. You're right in that being the main reason to just hang tight. Now, if it looks like the 18z NAM was looking from real early on, we can play the jaws music.
  6. You got it. I'm liking that the most and its not a tangible thing, just a vibe thing. Arguably the most important 18z euro run in its history (don't think it was running yet in 2016).
  7. Agreed. One thing I'd really like to see is some higher heights out in front NE of us. That can help once our low develops & if we do get a clean phase. We want our low to have as much of a due N component as possible. Backside energy dropping in can help with those heights.
  8. It does not look good NE of us, the trough is pretty broad, but the members are actually a bit west of their 12z location again.. GEFS hasn't done well of late but its interesting
  9. He is, and that piece is one of the keys thats been improving each run...
  10. @Jipossibly? But we let him experience the storm first? Trough is just kinda broad later in the GFS run, 12z was more v shaped...
  11. I agree, the h5 is a good bit better than some of the runs we've seen in the last 24 hours.. if that look continues and improves, the surface will show a lot better results. We're still at the range where surface panels/results are the least accurate prediction of a model.
  12. It is what it is, the predictive nature of certain things we could probably do without. I'd rather give better analysis about the features and results of the run after it comes out but sometimes its easy to predict. Runs like the NAM just look too good early to not say where they're headed.
  13. Lotta respect for that. I'll let ya finish this one up for us.
  14. What I will say is the alignment (per earlier post by @WinterWxLuvr which were looking for looks improved)
  15. We been on these threads back to Eastern about 12 years ago, at least get my name right Randy
×
×
  • Create New...