Jump to content

DDweatherman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,028

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by DDweatherman

  1. DDweatherman
    The bottom line which I can of course confirm, because I’m the only one who knows what I’m thinking is that Randy was upset because I had posted the two upper level images saying there was a difference. He thought I was questioning his ability to read a map, which I definitely wasn’t and it went from there. there’s no doubt in my mind I thought he overreacted, and started bringing the heat. It is what it is, and I won’t lie I didn’t respond With my true reflection of what he said because he is the admin.
  2. DDweatherman
    Trust me, never bothered me for a second. Life’s good, I am just thinking about when i can make it back out to McHenry
  3. DDweatherman
    That doesn’t mean make it personal and come after me. I started doing the PBP when he said he wasn’t gonna be around for the run, then 2 minutes later reappeared.
  4. DDweatherman
    I’m definitely sorry @mattie gthat clogged up the thread this morning. Should have never reached that point. I should have just ignored it.
  5. DDweatherman
    Yup, got a little 1-3"/2-4" on the table. Fluff factor, friday beer snow.
  6. DDweatherman
    I'm done with it, someones having a tough day. Not my fault. But I apologize. Happy to take it offline.
  7. DDweatherman
    Euro sadly could be setting up to get defeated by the GFS again. We really need the Euro to get back to performing how it did. It sucked as Dr.No, but the GFS has continually shut down this one for a lot of folks every time another piece of guidance gave/returned hope
  8. DDweatherman
    We do typically see the precip associated with the front piece trend NW a bit closer to gametime, cue to what @WxUSAF said earlier
  9. DDweatherman
    Sadly that still left it quite a bit east, but our focus in the 95 and west area has to be on the arctic front associated precip
  10. DDweatherman
    It's not like any of the PBP I've given is wrong... I said I wouldn't predict runs in advance. Its funny how some people appreciate it and appreciate it, and then there are others who don't.
  11. DDweatherman
    Can you hang it up now? It's time to be out
  12. DDweatherman
    Read my last post, I can't provide a 2 sentence explanation of whats going on to someone about the run if I want to be "first". Remember its not about being first, you said it. I'm here to give more practical info, not just be the first to post it. Easy to post wester and souther and a tad, etc. What if someone didn't see 6z or 0z?
  13. DDweatherman
    Not good haha, we need it to make some appreciable change with a cleaner phase and evolution. The next frame shows lower heights in the east from the TPV pressing down its influence. That flattens out our southern energy and creates a sloppier phase.
  14. DDweatherman
    Alignment of the northern and southern energy similar from 6z, but all of it happening a bit more west from last run.
  15. DDweatherman
    Unsure what you mean, you just said the same thing I said? AND it looked that way from 18 & 24, so whats the point you're making
  16. DDweatherman
    Through hour 18, GFS stronger with the energy diving down out of Canada, bringing it in slightly further west thus far Much of the same through 24 Watching the TPV up in Canada, looks similar to 6z thus far.
  17. DDweatherman
    Damn, and I was gonna sit the GFS out, but I'll give it a go for us one last time on this storm.
  18. DDweatherman
    The 12z RGEM is just not a fan of this storm, but it literally bounces back and forth so much
  19. DDweatherman
    0z was sharper than 12z at the base of the trof post phase, those 2 images show it pretty clearly
  20. DDweatherman
    Nah, it was a decent bit sharper if we're being honest. Shows clearly here
  21. DDweatherman
    trof axis is pretty similar, just a bit more tail from a slightly less clean phase. The axis of the northern energies dropping in isn't due N/S like 0z, but close
  22. DDweatherman
    Doesn't look all that far off from 0z at 54 if we're being honest. Better than 6z no doubt, but also not much worse than 0z
  23. DDweatherman
    TPV up NE is better aligned allowing some height rises over us... stressing how important that can be downstream
  24. DDweatherman
    Agreed, should be a bit better downstream provided the phase stays clean.
  25. DDweatherman
    Not really looking too closely at models this morning, but let's see if the NAM tries to suck us back in.
×
×
  • Create New...