Jump to content

Buddy1987

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,511

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Buddy1987

  1. Buddy1987
    Might want to hold that thought.. 45 looking nice comparing it to 6z with flow backing and heights rising.
  2. Buddy1987
    NAM looking to go Boom beginning at 45.. Major improvement on the digging and heights rising in the Northeast.
  3. Buddy1987
    Nam trying to take the trough and turn it neutral at 34. Not sure which way this is going yet. Some positives though up top with the large lobe above Superior.
  4. Buddy1987
    NAM is off and running. Close enough to it's medium range it may start to matter, at least when reviewing 5h panels.
  5. Buddy1987
    Those are some super conservative maps from folks.. goes to show the uncertainty.
  6. Buddy1987
    Ladies and Gents... BIGGGGGG day of model tracking. Been a fun time on the board last couple days. Lets get it!
  7. Buddy1987
    Shoot even down this way I’m worried about a south and east trend that develops and voids any significant accumulation from happening. ULL needs to almost be perfectly placed
  8. Buddy1987
    I feel like you can already see the heights are too flat and it’s not digging as much on the back side.. compared to the GFS that is@Weather Will
  9. Buddy1987
    Crazy to me it’s 2026 and within a 60-84 hr window I could be looking at 2 feet or 2 inches. I really wish we would invest some serious coin into the models.
  10. Buddy1987
    Canadian looked SUPER funky. Almost like convective feedback issues or some weird crap. It like merged the two storms together in the Atlantic and created like a damn typhoon lol.
  11. Buddy1987
    Lollll @BornAgain13 wiped off the map with 3 ft
  12. Buddy1987
    no words needed..
  13. Buddy1987
    Take us to the promised land Randy! About that time
  14. Buddy1987
    Def more west for sure.. same time was around Poplar Bluff or southeast Missouri now stretching back toward western Missouri. I just don’t personally like the heights in the northeast.
  15. Buddy1987
    0z RGEM at 66 looks better over the Midwest but heights are pretty flat in the northeast. Compared it to the GFS at the same time at 18z and there’s a pretty noticeable difference. Let the rest of the run play out and see if it improves.
  16. Buddy1987
    I just looked at it and compared to the 18z gfs. Looks like we would want heights to rise a good bit more in the northeast. 0z RGEM pretty dang flat but yes it does look better in the Midwest.
  17. Buddy1987
    Whatev’s it’s the ICON..
  18. Buddy1987
    Holy friggin crap YES! Out of nowhere. Keeps making the dog pop up after she’s fallen back asleep.
  19. Buddy1987
    If FV3 is any indication we are going to like it. H5 looked a tad better than what the NAM just showed. Usually a precursor to what the GFS will show us.
  20. Buddy1987
    FV3 at the end of its run looked even slightly better than NAM at same time. Hopefully that’s a precursor of good things to come from the GFS.
  21. Buddy1987
    NAM
  22. Buddy1987
    Snow breaking out foothills/sw va hr 72. Thing of beauty upcoming
  23. Buddy1987
    We all broke the NAM.. she stuck
  24. Buddy1987
    Pretty significant changes from 18z to 0z on the NAM at 54. Much more similar to GFS. Trough starting to go toward the neutral side and heights rising in the northeast.
  25. Buddy1987
    Wow.. 54 hrs big time tilt going on.. this is trending toward gfs. You can see heights rising pretty drastically from 18z in the northeast.
×
×
  • Create New...