Jump to content

lee59

Members
  • Posts

    2,507
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lee59

  1. 1 minute ago, Tatamy said:

    That is what has been happening out here.  It’s been snowing three hours here and there is all of 1” OTG.  Still waiting to see if we get the thump.

    It would be nice if you can get a thump of snow before any potential changeover.

  2. 10 minutes ago, wdrag said:

    Please keep us posted on webcam at 7PM and 9P.  After that's for sure all rain til maybe 10A Sunday when its too late. 

    Haven't see PHL and BWI reports but my guess at least 0.1" there---just via sleet. 

    Columbus Circle webcam for anyone interested:

     

    https://www.earthcam.com/usa/newyork/columbuscircle/?cam=columbus_circle

  3. 4 minutes ago, Sampson said:

    Got a place booked up in Saugerties NY tonight. Leaving the island around 1. Hopefully it’s worth it. 

     

    Now that the warm air may be going a little further inland, I think the Kingston-Saugerties area could be the bulls eye. Far enough north to stay snow and far enough south to be in the heavier bands. Probably double digit totals.

  4. 16 minutes ago, RU848789 said:

    I didn't say NYC would get 2-3" as a forecast - I was only talking about the 12Z GFS verbatim likely leading to 2-3" OTG in Central Park.  

    OK, my misunderstanding. Hopefully what the GFS is indicating turns out to be true, but I am not very hopeful.

    • Like 1
  5. 2 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

    That's what the href shows. A general 1 to 2 with 2 to 4 just nw of 95 through 0z Sunday so would be a decent thump between 4 and 7pm

    snowfall_024h_mean.ne.f03600_1.png

    To me that seems like a problem for coastal locations. I would think and easterly wind all day will have temperatures well above freezing by late afternoon.

    • Thanks 1
  6. 4 minutes ago, RU848789 said:

    I know, I said that.  I included the 10:1 map, as that shows how much snow is "falling" to illustrate that it's not "mostly rain."  Kuchera shows about 2" and I think that's underdone on the model verbatim, as column temps are below 32F on the model until the surface and given decent intensity (once snow starts accumulating, subsequent snow is not affected much by above 32F surface temps, as the actual surface is now 32F snow/slush), even NYC will accumulate maybe 2-3" from that 4.3" of snow falling.  That's my informed opinion.  I'm  not a met, but I guarantee you a PhD in chem eng'g and 30+ years of doing hard science including a lot of work in heat transfer and physical chemistry phase transitions (crystallizations and melting - with several patents in the field for organic molecules) and a lifetime of observing high intensity snow accumulating when people said it wouldn't (think most March/April storms), means a little bit.  This is not really a "meteorology" question (assuming the model is correct and no warm nose aloft, just above 32F at the surface), but a physical chemistry/rate question.  

    I hope your correct with NYC getting 2-3 inches. Out here I would be happy with about an inch of snow.

  7. 4 minutes ago, RU848789 said:

    That's incorrect.  Plenty of snow "falling" - it's just not clear how much of it will accumulate with 34-35F surface temps; during the thump part, NYC looks to be below 32F (barely) for the whole column, which is good.  So verbatim there will be snow and if we can avoid a warm nose aloft (who knows?) I think a few inches (not the 4.3" on the 10:1 map below) is likely - as per the GFS, not a forecast.  

    sn10_acc-imp.us_state_ne_s.png

    This looks way over done.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...