Jump to content

Radtechwxman

Members
  • Posts

    2,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Radtechwxman

  1. Then why in the corner does it say 12z Thurs current run?? Where it says valid 0z Thurs is actually the time frame I'm looking at. Wed night
  2. Hopefully won't get in trouble for posting this. Winds aloft not looking as westerly as before. Jet has more amplitude this time around and not as flat
  3. Well 12z euro took a step in the wrong direction. Hopefully just a bad run and not a trend. Looking more GFS like
  4. Yea GFS is all over the place. Euro has been holding relatively consistent. 12z gfs has no surface wave on Wed now and really lags the upper jet behind mostly likely cuz it has more amplitude then euro. Hopefully it caves eventually
  5. Couldn't say it better myself. And it has a nice tight sfc low which is deepening in that classic spot near the panhandles and se CO. Great turning like you said. If euro is right Wed def could be one of the bigger days in recent years in the southern Plains. And love that it is showing it in the better terrain near and west of I35
  6. Yea it's been tough to get some westerlies aloft the last several years. Slow moving meridional BS. So would be fantastic to see a lower amplitude trough for once
  7. 0z gfs very impressive. Esp on Wed. To me seems to be trending towards Euro like solution. Upper levels still more southerly than I prefer but still far out and plenty of time for improvement. Def a step in the right direction
  8. I still think Tues-Thurs have a decent risk of severe weather. Obviously depends on evolution and timing of trough but overall seems like a setup for a few chase days. After this we look to see a lull again into mid month and then possibly ramping up mid to late May again
  9. Thanks for posting those man! Appreciate it. That is gorgeous! Nice low amplitude broad based trough. I know andyhb is a fan of those and I love that it looks like another trough is loading in the SW behind it. Kinda reminds of the late May 2013. Could see several days of chasing opportunities with the possibility of a few bigger days.
  10. I wasn't able to see the upper levels on the site I use for Euro. However I did like the strong sfc low shown near the panhandles. Gfs had a similar position albeit weaker. The moisture and cape were great. What did the jet orientation look like? Seems like models are trending less positive tilt now
  11. Why isn't there a thread for this event yet? Just curious
  12. What site did you get those euro graphics from? I have a subsription to weathermodels now but not impressed
  13. I saw NAO is suppose to stay negative through at least next week so looking like that eastern trough will hold. Nor'easter galore. Heck by this time last yr I already saw several nice tornadoes
  14. Yea gfs is crazy. Powerhouse system is nearly stationary for days cuz of the strong blocking downstream. Would like to see a little more progression and less blocking. But overall this will def bring some chase days if gfs verifies. Ample moisture and very strong jet dynamics
  15. And right on cue. Latest advisory brought winds down to 165mph. Pressure holding at 910mb
  16. Yea that inner eyewall is being stubborn with letting go but def has last some of its moxy. I think Maria has it her full potential. I think we see a gradual rise in pressure as ERC attempts to finish and winds come down some. I'm thinking that we could see a landfall strength in PR anywhere from 155-165
  17. Clouds tops cooling pretty rapidly again in the core and wrapping around the eye. May see her have one more bout of intensification before reaching PR
  18. i know. i am just sayin that when the tornado was touching down just west of town it went large fast and was seen by spotters. but i do agree that it all happened so fast. the NWS did the best they could.
  19. well noted. it did transition very rapidly. if i am not mistaken, there was an outflow boundary in the region with strong 0-1km helicities. the storm really rapidly evolved once it took advantage of that boundary and its shear. instability kept the storm sustained with extreme CAPE values
  20. i totally agree. all warnings should be treated the same. take shelter. but i was just shocked there wasn't a tornado emergency when multiple spotters reported a large wedge doin damage
  21. that isn't strong enough wording. the warning should have said large and extremely dangerous tornado. and there should have been a tornado emergency.
  22. Does anyone know if a tornado emergency was issued for Joplin?
  23. i will be careful with what i write for now on. i shouldnt have said it doesnt make sense with what they were doin. bad choice of wording. i was trying to say i dont agree with their area at the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...