bluewave

Much cooler summer regime since 2013 with low pressure dominating instead of high pressure. Likely quite a bit of snow has fallen from this Arctic cyclone... Wish the polar bears could report obs [Map: esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/amy…]pic.twitter.com/nrL6U5LplZ

Yeah, the record August 2012 storm seemed to be the exception to the rule. http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2012/08/a-summer-storm-in-the-arctic/ Low pressure systems over the Arctic Ocean tend to cause the ice to diverge or spread out and cover a larger area. These storms often bring cool conditions and even snowfall. In contrast, high pressure systems over the Arctic cause the sea ice to converge. Summers dominated by low pressure systems over the central Arctic Ocean tend to end up with greater ice extent than summers dominated by high pressure systems. However, the effects of an individual strong storm, like that observed in early August, can be complex. While much of the region influenced by the August cyclone experienced a sudden drop in temperature, areas influenced by winds from the south experienced a rise in temperature. Coincident with the storm, a large area of low concentration ice in the East Siberian Sea (concentrations typically below 50%) rapidly melted out. On three consecutive days (August 7, 8, and 9), sea ice extent dropped by nearly 200,000 square kilometers (77,220 square miles). This could be due to mechanical break up of the ice and increased melting by strong winds and wave action during the storm. However, it may be simply a coincidence of timing, given that the low concentration ice in the region was already poised to rapidly melt out.

There may also be a higher degree of uncertainty in the PIOMAS data compared to other years. But we saw how the the PIOMAS and NSIDC extent widely diverged in 2013 compared to the 2007 season. Lower PIOMAS in 2013 vs 2007,but the cool 2013 summer resulted in a much higher higher September extent than 2007. http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2017/03/ It was a very warm autumn and winter. Air temperatures at the 925 hPa level (about 2,500 feet above sea level) over the five months spanning October 2016 through February 2017 were more than 2.5 degrees Celsius (4.5 degrees Fahrenheit) above average over the entire Arctic Ocean, and greater than 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit) above average over large parts of the northern Chukchi and Barents Seas. These overall warm conditions were punctuated by a series of extreme heat waves over the Arctic Ocean. Data from the European Space Agency’s CryoSat-2 satellite indicate that this winter’s ice cover may be only slightly thinner than that observed at this time of year for the past four years. However, an ice-ocean model at the University of Washington (PIOMAS) that incorporates observed weather conditions suggests the volume of ice in the Arctic is unusually low.

So far it looks like the Arctic storm has slightly slowed the decline rate as the pack appears to be spreading out a bit. The storm has brought an early freeze for the post 2005 Arctic. Right now the extent is tracking between 2007 and 2016 as 2012 pulls further out of reach.

There has traditionally been a relationship between Arctic sea ice and the AMO as we have seen with the decline in the 20's and 30's. More specifically, the region south of Greenland seems to have the largest influence on September minimum extent. When those SST's were at their warmest from 2005 -2012, there were three new records set in 2005, 2007, and 2012. The reversal to cooler SST's in this region since 2013 has been accompanied by no new September extent records. You can see the 2005-2012 rate of decline was in a class by itself with nothing else coming close. While that area south of Greenland has cooled dramatically in recent years, the AMO has still remained positive.

Recent cooler temps and stronger polar vortex let 2017 fall a little behind 2007 over the last few days.

Early dip near freezing with the strong polar vortex similar to 2014 and 2013.

It could also be related to why the Siberian October snow signal hasn't worked in recent winters with the stronger PV and more +AO/+NAO.

We missed our chance to beat 2012 when the strong dipole pattern of 2007-2012 failed to emerge in June. So the 2012 extent record will remain safe another year. The HadGem model did a great job back in 2012 showing a slower rate of loss vs the extreme 2005-2012 loss rate. I am wondering if the dramatic dipole reversal following the historic 2007-2012 rapid melt seasons is a result of the weaker AMOC? http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/ In the far northern Atlantic, warm water flowing northward from the tropics is cooled by the atmosphere, becomes denser, and eventually sinks to great depths. The descending water is key in driving a sub-surface and surface ocean circulation system called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which is part of the global ocean conveyor belt of heat and salinity. Where the Atlantic water sinks has a very important effect on the climate of Northern Europe; the heat that the ocean loses to the atmosphere is what keeps Northern Europe quite warm relative to its latitude. For example, Amsterdam is at the same latitude as Winnipeg, Canada, but experiences much warmer winters. Based on a recent modeling study, Florian Sévellec and colleagues propose that the ongoing loss of Arctic sea ice may disrupt the AMOC. The sea ice loss leads to a freshening of the northern North Atlantic and stronger heat absorption at the surface. This means that waters in the northern North Atlantic are less dense than they used to be, which has the effect of providing a cap, or lid, that may inhibit the northward flow of warm waters at the surface and the eventual sinking of these waters. The authors suggest that the Arctic sea ice decline may help to explain observations suggesting that the AMOC may be slowing down, and why there is a regional minimum in warming (sometimes called the Warming Hole) over the subpolar North Atlantic.

The median of the 36 September mean extent forecasts is slightly below last September.

It will be interesting to see if the September 2012 low extent record can remain in place into the early 2020's. Or if the dipole pattern makes a return in 18-19 finally allowing a new record minimum to be set. Not sure many in September 2012 though it would take so long to break the record.

The rate of losses did slow post 2012 relative to the rapid 2005-2012 decline rate. But the long term downward trend will continue. https://theconversation.com/why-arctic-melting-will-be-erratic-in-the-short-term-35969 A new study I co-authored with a team of Canadian and American scientists, published in Nature Climate Change, highlights that the recent slower melt is a temporary, but not unexpected, deceleration. The complex climate models used to make projections of future climate also exhibit similar periods of little change and more rapid change in Arctic sea ice. The recent trends are well within the range of these expectations. We might even see a decade or more with little apparent change in sea ice. The causes of these fluctuations in melt rate are still being explored. Onesuggestion is that slow variations in Atlantic sea surface temperatures are involved. More observations of the Arctic ocean, atmosphere and sea ice would help answer this question. An ice-free future? When will the Arctic be ice-free – or equivalently, when will the ball reach the bottom of the hill? The IPCC concluded it was likely that the Arctic would be reliably ice-free in September by 2050, assuming high future greenhouse gas emissions (where “reliably ice-free” means five consecutive years with less than 1 million km2 of sea ice). We expect the long-term decline in Arctic sea ice to continue as global temperatures rise. There will also be further bounces, both up and down. Individual years will be ice-free sometime in the 2020s, 2030s or 2040s, depending on both future greenhouse gas emissions and these natural fluctuations.

Yeah, the HadGEM1 did a great job. https://www.the-cryosphere.net/7/555/2013/ Mechanisms causing reduced Arctic sea ice loss in a coupled climate model A. E. West, A. B. Keen, and H. T. HewittMet Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK Received: 09 May 2012 – Discussion started: 18 Jul 2012 Revised: 04 Feb 2013 – Accepted: 18 Feb 2013 – Published: 26 Mar 2013 Abstract. The fully coupled climate model HadGEM1 produces one of the most accurate simulations of the historical record of Arctic sea ice seen in the IPCC AR4 multi-model ensemble. In this study, we examine projections of sea ice decline out to 2030, produced by two ensembles of HadGEM1 with natural and anthropogenic forcings included. These ensembles project a significant slowing of the rate of ice loss to occur after 2010, with some integrations even simulating a small increase in ice area. We use an energy budget of the Arctic to examine the causes of this slowdown. A negative feedback effect by which rapid reductions in ice thickness north of Greenland reduce ice export is found to play a major role. A slight reduction in ocean-to-ice heat flux in the relevant period, caused by changes in the meridional overturning circulation (MOC) and subpolar gyre in some integrations, as well as freshening of the mixed layer driven by causes other than ice melt, is also found to play a part. Finally, we assess the likelihood of a slowdown occurring in the real world due to these causes.

I think some people are coming into each season thinking that it will be a continuation of the 2007-2012 mega dipole pattern. But outside July 2015, the summer Arctic pattern did a complete reversal following that 2012 record breaking summer. It was like the 2012 extremes of low sea ice extent and Greenland melt flipped a switch over to a new regime. Maybe some type of mini summer Arctic D-O event?

I agree. The coming cooldown across the CAB should keep 2017 behind the 2012 extent over the next the next 10 days. 2012 will probably run away from 2017 in early August when the steep 2012 drop occurred. With the exception of July 2015, a cooler polar vortex has dominated the Arctic summers from 2013-2017.

Yeah, and how much colder this summer is in Greenland compared to 2012. http://polarportal.dk/en/nyheder/arkiv/nyheder/bringing-harmonie-to-the-greenland-ice-sheet/ Martin Stendel, Polar Portal leader, agrees. “This year has been extremely unusual, with a snowy winter and then a cool period at the start of this month. It’s extremely important we get the surface mass balance right.” The period from the 27th June to the 5th July saw days with close to zero or even slightly positive SMB (a net gain in mass) as well as a record low temperature recorded at the DMI weather station at Summit -33.0 °C. This weather along with the snowfall in early June, and following from the heavy snow in the Autumn, has led to a relatively high surface mass balance for the time of year and an unusually bright and reflective ice sheet, as shown in the albedo anomaly map on the Polar Portal (and below). Professor Jason Box of GEUS explains “when we see cold snowy conditions like this in the summer time it brings melt to a halt. The fresh snow is bright and reflects sunlight whereas in normal years dark bare glacier ice is usually exposed at this time of year and so melt rates are strong. This is why we track the albedo through the year to see how much melt we can expect”. So far this summer there has been less melt than usual. As DMI weather forecaster Jesper Rosberg explains, “we have seen a persistent positive North Atlantic Oscillation this summer and the jet stream has been very far south of Greenland with very cold air over the ice sheet, so the precipitation falling this summer has mostly been snow, rather rain. ” The cold and snowy conditions have been hindering scientific fieldwork this summer. But there are still several weeks of the ablation season left and the weather for the rest of July and August will determine the surface mass balance of Greenland this year. As far as DMI scientists know this is the first time that the SMB of the Greenland ice sheet has been calculated with such a sophisticated model in near real-time and it’s all the more interesting since we have snowfall interfering with melt.

On JAXA and NSIDC extent we probably missed to our chance to beat 2012 with the stronger PV pattern from June into early July. It even fell a little behind last year in recent days.

Either natural variability or the early emergence of the CCSM4 summer pattern in response to climate change. The NH summer circulation since 2013 bears a strong similarity to the presentation below. https://ams.confex.com/ams/94Annual/webprogram/Paper235210.html

Interesting increase in NH snow cover for June compared to recent years. The highest in over a decade.

After record breaking -AO and KB block last fall, the PV has mostly been in charge. While we had some transient Arctic blocking episodes, but the PV quickly makes a return.

It's funny how the pattern reversed right after the paper was published. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1029/2012GL053268/asset/grl29604.pdf;jsessionid=F7950891CB18B3DB5580C02EC912A4A1.f01t03?v=1&t=j4ppf2qo&s=29436c163ab48e25e8f4989445de41091a8d6ccd&systemMessage=Wiley+Online+Library+'Journal+Subscribe+%2F+Renew'+page+will+be+down+on+Wednesday+05th+July+starting+at+08.00+EDT+%2F+13.00+BST+%2F+17.30+IST+for+up+to+75+minutes+due+to+essential+maintenance. Thus we can say that a six year run of near one standard deviation negative excursions (2007–2012) is unique in the 63 year record. To further test the significance of the 2007–2012 AD patterns we randomly generated 10,000 time series, each with 63 points to match the observed time series and with a normal distribution without autocorrelation. For this simple calculation, the chance for having five consecutive values with a negative AD of magnitude greater than 1.0 standard deviation units in a sample size of 63 is rare, less than 1 in a 1000.

While the overall annual temperature trend is an unmistakable up, it would be interesting to know what changed after the 2012 summer. To get a 6 year historic stretch of dipole patterns during the summer and then a reversal is pretty extreme 500 mb behavior.

June officially continues the post 2012 pattern of a more active polar vortex and cooler temps.You can see the long range ensembles continuing this general pattern right into July.

You are right. That was probably the better example of Volume vs extent divergence. 2007 was the year of the mega dipole. Remarkable how a version of the summer pattern repeated much of the time until 2012 and then abruptly reversed.

It's interesting how big a difference the extents can vary with similar volume depending on weather conditions. We saw the divergence between 11 and 12 extents on similar volume due to the much more hostile weather pattern in 12.