Jump to content

tombo82685

Members
  • Posts

    13,428
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tombo82685

  1. Once waa pushes into that cold air should increase lift and precip should expand
  2. I still don’t see the support for kbuf snow map unless they are expecting decent ratios? Nam looked pretty decent with omega within a fat dgz, but that could be overcooked with it having more amped look still.
  3. Agreed, on using mesos. But to me nam is probably to amped up. But they will have correct idea with mids where euro and gfs will miss the tiny warm layers a loft
  4. would bet on the kick aspect of it. Though that should bring some light snow maybe decent lake effect with the ull energy swinging through
  5. Euro looks good, let’s get that about another 50-75 miles further north please
  6. Euro looks ggem like, maybe hair warmer. Gets mixing to about bgm
  7. If it means a big waa slug of qpf, yes, me personally I would. Sleet just adds girth to the pack
  8. Yes, your area being further west look fine. It’s give and take though. While primary low is hanging on more it increases the waa precip for a better front end thump. I’d rather blitz for 6hrs with 1-2”hr rates than 12hrs of yawn flakes
  9. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=ukmet&p=850th&rh=2022022112&fh=96&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  10. Ggem does look good. I’d like to get that a bit further north that low track
  11. Yea, but that transfer can be delayed as primary holds longer basically what I’m alluding to.
  12. Yup, I will gladly risk taint if it means we get a better waa push of qpf.
  13. Lock that gfs run up, 8-10 up here. Sadly though, still 4 days away and there is nothing stopping this from going further north outside of tpv placement. More energy consolidates out west, north we go.
×
×
  • Create New...