Jump to content

moneypitmike

Members
  • Posts

    29,870
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by moneypitmike

  1. 4 minutes ago, SR Airglow said:

    I'm not ignoring for BOS but I think CT is probably too far west to do double digits with this one. You and I are probably good for a foot I'd say.

    This.  Perhaps 8-12 on the mid-coast.

    2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

    This storm is going to be a monster regardless of its impact on us.

    Obviously the snow amounts look to be taking a significant hit, but the storm itself will be impressive.

    If a tree falls in the forest......

    • Thanks 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

    Sipprell gone wild .. SGW

    
    Highlights...
    
     - Potent snow storm, potential blizzard Monday night into Tuesday
    
     - Moderate to heavy snow, some locations seeing upwards of a
       foot perhaps two feet, 1-3"/hr snowfall rates, plus winds
       could yield blizzard conditions with visibility less than a
       quarter of a mile
    
     - Around southeast MA a pastier, sticking snow, plus winds,
       tree damage and power outage potential
    
     - Strong to damaging winds, E gusts up around 60 mph possible
       for E/SE MA coast, brunt of the winds around Tuesday morning
    
     - Impacts to the Tuesday AM commute with difficult, near-
       impossible travel.
    
     - Especially the Tuesday morning high tide, strong E onshore
       flow yielding around a 2 to 3 foot surge, splashover, minor
       coastal flood issues, especially ocean-facing shores,
       vulnerable areas impacted by earlier storm systems
    
    */ Overview...
    
    Potent snow storm forecast, potential blizzard. Rex block held firm
    over SE Canada, stout H5 ridge in advance, yields slowed progression
    upstream. Opportunity for S-stream to cyclonically pivot round the
    diving Central N America PV-stream along the 310K isentropic surface
    initially rather than phase. Last several model runs, N-stream cold
    punch has evolved further W (H85-5 thermal fields), potency of the S-
    stream ramped up, aforementioned PV-stream connection delayed until
    further downstream over SE Canada, energy wrapping in, phasing later
    in time. But how far out is the S-stream steering with respect to
    our coast?
    
    For now, looking like a good punch for E/SE-coastal MA, near-classic
    Cape Cod type storm with 40N / 70W benchmark passage. N-stream
    entrenching as the S-stream gets pulled back. Clipping New England
    with significant outcomes, streams pulling together over SE Canada
    yielding a slower moving, bigger storm.
    
    So what`s in store for S New England? As mentioned, sharpness and
    potency of S-stream noted in last several model runs. Inflow along
    the cyclonic warm conveyor belt pronounced beneath cyclonic pivoting
    of energy. Beneath broader diffluence, ramped-up cyclogenesis, the
    surface low with pressure falls 3-4 mb/hr dropping to as low as 970
    mb near the 40N / 70W benchmark SE of Nantucket, isallobaric wind
    response, conveyor belt motions amplified (H925-85 E wind profile 60
    to 75 mph across E MA, +3-4 standard deviations), do expect thermal
    packing along with strong lift / forcing brought about by trowaling
    moisture (precipitable waters 0.50 to 1.00 inch, +1 to 2 standard
    deviations) up against the cold conveyor belt. Resultant fronto-
    genesis along 285-305K isentropic surfaces back into S New England.
    
    Subsequent SW-NE snow-banding signatures initially, orienting N-S
    with time all the way back as far as the Berkshires. Strong omega
    through the column, upwards 50 microbars per second especially over
    SE New England. Pouring snow for some locations, 1-3"/hr snowfall
    rates. Parent S-stream cold conveyor belt chilly enough, colder air
    brought down from aloft via intense precip, altering snow ratios.
    Potential instability noted, especially along E/SE- coastal MA,
    can`t rule out thundersnow given such along with deep cyclogenesis,
    collocation of some measure of -EPV parent with low to mid level
    frontogenesis (some slantwise if not upright instability H5-H7).
    Add in the winds, and the potential exists for blizzard conditions
    as CIPS analog probabilities suggest.

    Too bad you always dismiss him.

  3. 1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

    Here's a wild science fiction plot ...

    Supposin' the time-change f'ed up that run. Their model does this 4-D correction scheming, which is intrinsically containing some sort of time consideration ... 'what if' their ingest got weird because of we sent them our data at time they forget/or erred in correcting their grids for - ...

    Key term....fiction.

  4. 2 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

    yeah thats a problem...its the start of a 10 day around the world trip and I work all day Thursday in London.  Was hoping the int'l flights would get priority to land.

    Isn't it great racking up the frequent flyer miles for free trips you have no desire to go on because you just want to be home when the work trips are done?

  5. 1 minute ago, WthrJunkyME said:

    Happy to see a bunch do well.  We’ll just sit back quietly and bust over our 100” total on this one.  

    I had not been up there for measurements along the way--but until the couple weeks leading to last week's storm, things did look pretty good up there.

    My effort to get the family excited to drive to Pit2 tomorrow night for a snowstorm went over like a lead balloon.  I hope I can finagle at least a solo trip.

  6. 3 minutes ago, DomNH said:

    Last week was fun but I'll pass on the 1-2' depth in mid-March. I am just getting caught up on the models this morning and I don't think I can wish this one away. 

    I'll never pass on the storm.  But, to the point of depth, give me the big storms in December.  March pads season totals but it's short-lived once the storm passes.

×
×
  • Create New...