Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    71,102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by weatherwiz

  1. 2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    Much less impressive aloft that run but that’s gonna happen. It’s why we’re not forecasting 1-2 feet. But I think the general idea of a favorable track puts a floor of about 7-8” there. Exact dynamic evolution still TBD which will determine whether it’s 8-10” or 12-18” in your area. 

    If that banding materializes quick enough I think Ray has a good shot for 15” or so. This one will have lots of surprises, on the high and low side. It will be what it will be 

    • Like 1
  2. 6 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

    No way to pinpoint exactly where this sets up, especially at this stage.  ‘13 in the February blizzard, the death band was forecast to set up over eastern/northeast areas, and it came back this way.  That was not forecast even the day of.  So I mean we can take a guess of course, but in the end it’s just a guess. 

     

    6 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

    Wait another cycle and it will be somewhere totally different . Last run 700mv low was in central Jersey . Could either go back south or end up over BDL next run 

    Yes, there is a great deal of uncertainty with it and there is no way to know for sure right now exactly where it holds up. That's why I've held off on making any type of forecast at this point. But what I'm looking at is as we get closer, how will the modeled band be in relation to what occurs? My thinking is at verification time, the banding is going to end up being northwest of where the models are pinpointing.  Looking at where the models show the highest QPF axis 12 hours out and saying that is the sweet spot may not work out that way. 

  3. Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    Only 6 hour intervals...12Z

     

    Screenshot 2024-02-10 at 4.28.07 PM.png

    I really hope there won't be much subsidence south of the band. Haven't divulged too much into those details yet but that is always a concern. I am also a bit nervous by this placement b/c the most intense banding (I think in this case) would be displaced towards the northwest side of this fronto...so the highest totals would be like S VT/S NH....then south of there could have several different issues going on.

    • Like 1
  4. Trying to get a feel for ratios right now. Obviously the farther south you go, the ratios won't be as great but I think ratios for the most part should be relatively good for most. Maybe right around 10:1 for most and then under the intense banding, maybe 13:1 to as high as 15:1? Again, where sfc is a bit more marginal, ratios probably a bit less than 10:1.  

  5. 17 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

    I agree, that was just the high end tease of what’s possible .. 

    I didn't even see your post...we must have posted at the same time :lol:

    But my post wasn't in reference to what you were saying at all, the way the posts lined up it looked like I was refuting your post but that wasn't the case. 

    I agree with you, that is the high end tease...maybe we can slow this down a bit and achieve that. 

    • Like 1
  6. 4 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

    So you think this will be amped ?:weep:

    I am starting to like the increasing consistency with the GFS/Euro, at least with some of the pieces involved. Not sure or really interested what the snow maps or showing. Based on how this would likely evolve, however, I would think that the best banding and heaviest snow is going to be quite north and west of the sfc low...so even if there was a track which favored say NYC or the south coast, the heaviest banding would likely be north. I think things tighten up too late to really get the banding to collapse south towards the center until eastern areas. 

×
×
  • Create New...