Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    71,087
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by weatherwiz

  1. 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

    When I was toggling h5 at 42h, it was def a tick north. I don’t toggle QPF maps when I’m doing my analysis 

    Yeah I'm not sure why anyone would want to really do that, that analysis doesn't tell you anything at all. If you're seeing changes I would think you'd want to look at what the root cause is and look for any changes in evolution, structure, lift, etc. Sure the 18z GFS may be "south" but it was more juiced overall. That's a ton of QPF being thrown into some intense lifting. 

  2. Still pretty impressive stuff on the 18z GFS bufkit for BDL. 45 units of omega into the SGZ is pretty wild stuff. I am still a little nervous about getting widespread 12''+ (but did that anyways) given how quickly this race through. Cobb technique does have ratios under the banding around 13:1. If we can get ratios that high then 12''+ should happen

    image.thumb.png.cf1c54e8ca1bf1043859e2fd649e28ab.png

    • Like 3
  3. 2 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

    Nicely done 

    Not as confident out towards the Cape. I always have low confidence out there since I never go into great depth looking. Spent alot of time trying to digest the banding potential and highest total swath. I almost didn't want to include that area and go with a larger range because its going to be very difficult to determine how that evolves. 

  4. 1 minute ago, JKEisMan said:

    Nam3km is beautiful for CT.

    It is. The 3km NAM also aligns more with my thinking currently. I've never been big on the NAM for this type of system and was just more curious with how it would handle banding over anything else. The NAM has been more inconsistent run-to-run than most other models. I am inclined to toss it...but there is always that worry it "sniffs" something out. Working on a snowfall forecast now.

  5. Just now, JoeSnowBOS said:

    NWS Boston updated its Winter Storm watch….was 4-10 inches yesterday and today it’s 4-8….brought down top amounts. Wonder why…..hmm


    .

    The upper end of totals is going to be held back just due to how quickly this is racing through. I think it's still a challenge as to what the upper range is but I would think it will be tough for even the hardest hit areas to get more than a foot. 

    • Like 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    Much less impressive aloft that run but that’s gonna happen. It’s why we’re not forecasting 1-2 feet. But I think the general idea of a favorable track puts a floor of about 7-8” there. Exact dynamic evolution still TBD which will determine whether it’s 8-10” or 12-18” in your area. 

    If that banding materializes quick enough I think Ray has a good shot for 15” or so. This one will have lots of surprises, on the high and low side. It will be what it will be 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...