calculus1

Not pick on you specifically, BristowWx, because many posts point to the same sentiment, but does anyone ever say the opposite of your bolded statement before the next iteration arrives? For instance, "00z runs will be boring." We always look expectantly for the next set of model runs, and they are always eagerly anticipated. It is only after they arrive that we decide whether we want to put more or less weight on that particular run depending on whether the outcome is favorable to our desired solutions. Anyway, I read that same statement multiple times prior to each potential storm during the winter, and I always find it rather funny.

Not true. Your solid analysis is quite welcome there, burrel. Others' unfounded prognostications are not. Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Booooooo! Boo, I say. Don't bring that negativity into our optimistic emotive gathering of like-minded individuals. Down with you, good sir!

^Cute kid you have there, Shaggy.

So far, only 15% of the board are killsjoys when it comes to freezing rain. The rest of us at least like a bit of it. And over 60% of us are okay with the Armageddon scenario of no power for a week. That's the adventurous spirit I was hoping to find here amongst my SE brethren. BTW, we need a freezing rain emoticon of some sort.

Wild weather is amazing no matter what type. My preference for wintry type precipitation events go in this order: snow > graupel > sleet > freezing rain > thunderstorms > rain

Awesome family, franklinwx! Man, with four daughters, you're going to be spending quite a chunk of change on weddings at some point.

Aha! The lack of a comma does make quite the difference. By the way, in the pic, are those snow pea pods located about 4/5 of the way up the burger?

Congrats again, Burger. You have a lovely bride. I wish you many happy years of marriage.

Yes, thumbs up to Mr. Bob being green-tagged. I'm sure you'll do the board proud.

Sorry, not trying to offend. It was supposed to be more of a joke that obviously fell flat. I recant. Edit: I deleted my earlier post.

I think you meant "...lack of knowledge..." "No lack of knowledge" would be a double negative implying they do have this weather knowledge you speak of, upon which they base their opinions.