Jump to content

Sey-Mour Snow

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sey-Mour Snow

  1. 1 hour ago, Heisy said:

    I made a comparison GIF of the 6z vs 12z vs 18z runs… the 6z and 18z runs give the event a chance by stretching out the trough and lagging some energy behind. Once again, need some other guidance to show this happening for it to be believable. That is a pretty damn juicy mean for this far out though. Maybe the best all year?
    25dbe523c0f77737b72fcdaa7c500111.gif


    .

    I’ve noticed almost every 6z and 18z run have had the storm for 4-5 days now and the 00z and 12zs lose it. Weird. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Weenie 1
  2. 1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    I was plenty specific enough:

    January 2023 Outlook

    January Analogs:1971, 1976, 1985, 1986,1996 2011, 2014, 2021, 2022
    January is like to be consistent with climatology in that it will be the most consistently fierce month in that there is likely to be "storms and rumor of storms", to quote an old and wise weather weenie. It was mentioned that opportunities for a coupling of EPO/PNA style blocking with NAO blocking would be scarce this season, but if it is to occur, it will be this month, as evidenced by the January 2023 forecast H5 composite:
    AVvXsEiidvSOE1pjHW6Tud9F_FU4SO32DoOaJm4h
    The recovery of  the PNA from the RNA month of December is also evident in the ECMWF forecast:
    AVvXsEgAif9I87FpHjvdQnlissZMKngiZJ1oD7Cj

     
    Note the opportunity for cross polar flow and what will at times be frigid conditions. This will also be a month of great flux, which will likely couple with well above average N hemispheric SSTs and a surplus of water vapor owed to the submarine eruption of Hunga Tonga last January help to facilitate a large scale and perhaps generation storm opportunity. This event will be the signature storm of the season, and will have the potential to cripple travel over a widespread area for a time in a window between approximately January 6th-20th
    This is the month that the mid Atlantic likely receives the bulk of its seasonal snowfall. January will be the inverse of December in that it will be biased more wintery earlier, but blocking should relinquish its grip and it should modify with flooding threats possible during a major thaw.
     
    January 2023 Forecast Temp Anomalies:
     
    1951-2010:
     
    AVvXsEgz-adLOe0xXQK5RY1GbFja5Ydp82OO9d_m

    1991-2020:
     
     
    AVvXsEg1Eu6sezjjj8S3WeprBJUrR0qL-yR97C3q

    January 2023 Forecast Precip Anomalies:
     
    1951-2010:
     
    AVvXsEixql4zAnTZwi6ak2f8sRZNIXb33i2B_aaE

    1991-2020:
     
    AVvXsEhSsAjYcPr3GGDQNU2NYnauiAZ1vI_uunIi

    It would not be a surprise if precipitation was underestimated especially during the month of January in the analog composites, 
    but also even during the season in general given the unique circumstances surrounding Hunga Tonga.

    What does the major thaw being in early January instead of late January do to your forecast? You stated cold and stormy early and thaw late. But we most likely thaw Jan 1-5/6.

  3. 18 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

    This is a teaching moment . You can’t feel like you’re forecasting in December when you’re calling for 50’s. Because it’s not normal . In Morch it is . High temps in Dec avg colder . So when you lose the month.. you really do lose 

     

    There’s been a stretch of days with highs between 55 to 65 almost every winter.  It’s pretty normal. We had a stretch of 70s in January I think in 2019? 

    • Haha 1
  4. 38 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

    I just need something.. anything to give me something wx wise to look forward to. Last week at least I had the HWW. There’s literally nothing . Not sure the last time we’ve gone over a month with nothing 

    We have record highs to look forward to.

    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
    • Weenie 1
  5. 17 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    I feel like the GEFS actually change the pattern earlier than the EPS but it just never gets as favorable as the EPS. 
     

    Like here’s D11…EPS looks worse than GEFS here:

    B8C42FCB-895F-436E-B183-3B993D774A9B.thumb.png.1e918755f28af23a1d062b34dca6b242.pngBC09DC8A-F13E-4801-8689-37C75715FC59.thumb.png.2a46b6f79e1b92b594a2a1a642b2bf0c.png

     

     

    But by the time we get to D13-14, the EPS looks a lot better in the PAC but I’d don’t really hate either look:

    FDF84321-EB55-4233-92B5-A9DC2E7E2AF3.thumb.png.cf7d71630ac57020673777e5dc05d872.pngC0408976-9F8E-4BB7-9D80-DBBAAC8B0071.thumb.png.a4ca6a9f299f07b4fc81a66a468af243.png

    Ya true, definitely would prefer the EPS to verify verbatim.

  6. 20 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    Yeah and we’re prob waiting longer in SNE. At least the pattern change is moving forward on the ensembles. We’re not yet seeing it get pushed back which is about all you can ask for at the moment. Hopefully that doesn’t change but it’s always a possibility. 

    Looks like GEFS and GEPS pushed back a bit.  EPS looked fine but GEFS led the charge in pacific last pattern change. 

×
×
  • Create New...