Jump to content

wxsniss

Members
  • Posts

    5,780
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wxsniss

  1. I’m relatively bullish on this.
    Feels like there’s multiple ways to have some impact… longwave pattern is decent, stronger northern energy and/or the slightest stream interaction gets at least some impact to 95 corridor/SNE…

    Usual caveats, nothing is guaranteed at this point and details tbd… but the “thread the needle” outcome is OTS imo.

    • 100% 1
  2. Today's cold snowless winter day ≈ Pats win #4... useless and unwanted by winter/Pats fans.

    Just looked GFS 18z/6z vs. 12z H5 so hugely different... especially northern stream energy dives down better on 18z/6z instead of getting lost over Manitoba. Unfortunately I don't think we'll be confident with that variable until closer, but I'm not so discouraged by the 12z suite. When the outcome is so sensitive to just the slightest stream interaction, I actually lean against OTS with zero impacts as depicted at 12z.

    • 100% 2
  3. 3 hours ago, weathafella said:

    We actually went to the movies to see the new Dylan flick-A Complete Unknown.  It was very well done!  That was followed by some pretty bad Chinese food.

    All somehow related ways to mark the holiday :)

    Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukah all!

    Here’s to some region-wide crushings of yore in January…

  4. 2 hours ago, ORH_wxman said:

    The common really is awesome when there’s snow during Christmas season. Next few nights are gonna be really awesome for skating on Frog Pond with all the lights and snow. 

     

    1 hour ago, mreaves said:

    It has nothing on Quebec City though.

     

    4 hours ago, moneypitmike said:

    That's a sad statement about the world.  

    Cobblestoned lamp-lit Beacon hill is pretty iconic too

    Anyway, not necessarily agreeing with this list (methodology was by showing people photos), but here were top cities:

    1041981826_BeautifulWinterCitiesNews2024PremierInnLarge.thumb.jpeg.c5b5285e4a32fc51ba5941441228be8a.jpeg

    • Like 1
  5. 14 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

    Just have to laugh. What a beat down these last 3 years.

    Completely sympathize.

    I was fully expecting mostly white rain in the city with C-1" to finish, par for the past 3 years.

    Literally 5 mile of CF placement made all the difference for you guys further east.

    Still have a few hours and CF looks over/past you, hopefully you pick up a few:

    778866959_Untitled2.jpg.df2e0fcc1007db7fd8f4fb84b2111467.jpg

  6. 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

    This could be a heck of a bust for BOS down to interior SE MA. And I mean in a good way. Compared to the forecasts I saw.

    Yep, and fwiw much of that bust so far is OES and placement of the CF

    Bodes well for later this afternoon when larger synoptic stuff develops

    18z HRRR looks great for 4-6pm

    • Like 1
  7. Honestly was surprised to be on NW side of CF all morning here in Fenway, I thought it would set up closer to 128 and we'd be in white rain all day

    Boston metro has not had a positive bust for years, meager as this is it's a great feeling. We've been < 1 mi vis for hours. Guesstimating 1-2" so far and all OES.

    I think this is the CF now, between Quincy / Weymouth and Canton / Randolph, slinking SE... @CoastalWx and others you should hopefully turn soon

    IMG_6670.thumb.jpg.11e45cf289394cf5e19826df442e6faf.jpg

     

    • Like 1
  8. Destructive interference from that lead vorticity and we just miss a significant event... if this were a single isolated model run, I'd be tempted to attribute the disconnect between H5 and surface low position as runaway convection

    48-60 hrs out, still not unrealistic for this to weigh the lead annoying energy slightly less as we get closer

  9. 4 minutes ago, weathafella said:

    Well if you just look at Boston and metro west, 1993-94 was a major all timer.  Certainly in my top 3 experienced as is 2014-15 and probably 1960-61.   1995-96 goes to #4 due to the spectacular melts-lasting for weeks.

    93-94 was my first winter in Boston. Man were my expectations irreversibly distorted.

    The potential and actual results of this December remind me of a Jerod Mayo pre-season quote I heard on WEEI this morning: "1000% percent... we have a lot of cap space... ready to burn some cash"

  10. Good to be back. So desperate for snow like everyone here / depressed by what seems like a new climate normal, seemingly exactly coinciding with Brady leaving.

    At the very least for my toddler to experience snow, he was so excited Jan 7 2024.

    One major and somewhat earlier improvement on this 0z NAM is vort max is more consolidated at base of trough... e.g. h54-60 it was previously shmearing out into Tenn / Miss, now more consolidated. We get better trough structure and start to see a negative tilt. This is so close to something much better.

    • Like 1
  11. 15 hours ago, wxsniss said:

    Thoughts? Anyone try this?

    Part of me hopes this is just more typical hype than an actual game changer… I think we’d all miss the suspense and art of forecasting snow storms.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/04/science/google-ai-weather-forecast.html

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08252-9

    “ Here we introduce GenCast, a probabilistic weather model with greater skill and speed than the top operational medium-range weather forecast in the world, ENS, the ensemble forecast of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts4. GenCast is an ML weather prediction method, trained on decades of reanalysis data. GenCast generates an ensemble of stochastic 15-day global forecasts, at 12-h steps and 0.25° latitude–longitude resolution, for more than 80 surface and atmospheric variables, in 8 min. It has greater skill than ENS on 97.2% of 1,320 targets we evaluated and better predicts extreme weather, tropical cyclone tracks and wind power production.”

    IMG_6318.thumb.jpeg.fa3c977b041e69b56898a3f51d289b3b.jpeg

    I actually posted the Nature paper link and portion of abstract about GenCast yesterday, lost in the Banter thread… curious about people’s thoughts.

    • Like 1
  12. Thoughts? Anyone try this?

    Part of me hopes this is just more typical hype than an actual game changer… I think we’d all miss the suspense and art of forecasting snow storms.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/04/science/google-ai-weather-forecast.html

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08252-9

    “ Here we introduce GenCast, a probabilistic weather model with greater skill and speed than the top operational medium-range weather forecast in the world, ENS, the ensemble forecast of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts4. GenCast is an ML weather prediction method, trained on decades of reanalysis data. GenCast generates an ensemble of stochastic 15-day global forecasts, at 12-h steps and 0.25° latitude–longitude resolution, for more than 80 surface and atmospheric variables, in 8 min. It has greater skill than ENS on 97.2% of 1,320 targets we evaluated and better predicts extreme weather, tropical cyclone tracks and wind power production.”

    IMG_6318.thumb.jpeg.fa3c977b041e69b56898a3f51d289b3b.jpeg

  13. 23 hours ago, wxsniss said:

    Will be at Fenway Saturday 4pm game, first time for the kids... 

    Don't like the sound of a Flood Watch through 8pm, but only 12z HREF still has some lingering rain east through most of the game (and backed off from 0z HREF) vs. NAM/3kNAM/HRRR clear it out a few hours earlier

    Working out nicely for game... early cloud cover will mitigate temps, and we might get a nice canopy sunset later

    Never understood the flood watch outside of southern areas...  NAM/HRRR were pretty good in timing of clearing, GFS was only guidance keeping significant activity into late afternoon

    • Like 1
  14. Will be at Fenway Saturday 4pm game, first time for the kids... 

    Don't like the sound of a Flood Watch through 8pm, but only 12z HREF still has some lingering rain east through most of the game (and backed off from 0z HREF) vs. NAM/3kNAM/HRRR clear it out a few hours earlier

    • Like 1
  15. Impressive event to watch on radar

    I didn't measure but I'm guessing this was probably close to derecho criteria?

    60 mile span with multiple mesovorts / bows, frequent gusts > 58 mph along most of its length, several gusts > 75 mph...  but maybe was < 400 miles in duration? Outflow starting outpacing the band around Providence

×
×
  • Create New...