Jump to content

pasnownut

Members
  • Posts

    9,516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pasnownut

  1. .....and he thinks he's the weather god...knowitall. I dont take well to those kind.
  2. Absolutely. Still may go in a bad/worse direction for us here in the LSV, so be prepared. Clean snow is probably not likely down/over here, but as little taint as possible would be the win IMO. We'll find out shortly.
  3. I'll take 10 JB's over 1 of him....No joke. NO THANKS. Hoping you dont hang your weather hat on DT's mantle....
  4. You bet. While we all love the snow maps and use them for fun....with the challenge of getting the pieces in the right place....its really not worth the fun/pain yet. With so many moving parts 500low/700low/ridge axis, the only thing that has been a stable piece (and largely why I've taken my "it'll be SE stance) - is the antecedent cold and HP that continually is showing up. You dont just bully that stuff around, and we are now seeing corrections as the cold is being realized. Nice CAD is showing up, and notably south, and with that mindset, I hope we get the couple adjustments needed for this to climb the coast and not sit over my head or retrograde like 0z sorta presented. Oh...and one other thing...ENS guidance still shows SE movement a definite possibility. Here's to a good day of tracking.
  5. Could also be 50 miles west, but we still have enough ensemble guidance saying we are still in the game. Cone narrows today/night. Didnt stay up for GFS last night cause I still thought it had work to do to catch on, and knew the look wouldnt be great...yet. Seeing 6Z was looking more like its getting there.
  6. While often discounted...when it shows continuity....we take. Gnight all.
  7. wowzers. It's all about trends...until they go the wrong way....right. Gonna sleep on this and dream a little dream.
  8. Germans have it a bit south. look at 540's. I dare say that this might be a good one incoming.
  9. NAM looking good for sure...but before we start getting to chirpy...That HP to the north likely scoots and doesnt anchor, so that boundary will likely erode some, but yeah, verbatim an inland runner would hopefully be lower probs.
  10. I pointed out the 84 hr panels because thats when things are coming together, as that will have a notable effect to later panels (and why your coastal Carolina theory might hold some water. ) Until the deep south SLP position and 500's get better resolved, its premature to get "too wrapped up" no matter where one sits IMO (tempting for sure though).
  11. Impressive cold w/ HP sitting on us. Verbatim I dunno how this cuts... And the big brother for the same timestamp. These aren't small differences.
  12. As some earlier suggested an inland option based on ridge axis, if that's the case, the ridge/trough axis just bumped a bit E/SE...and closer to ideal for many here....
  13. as Mag suggested, w/ antecedent cold being pretty stout...coupled w/ a 1037HP to the north....I'm just not seeing how the GFS depiction of it attacking/cutting west makes alot of sense (thinking physics here). That couplet would argue for a correction SE. It may be starting to latch onto that theory, or something else above my pay grade. Dunno.
  14. then you'll like the GIF I just posted just above yours w/ the RGEM... Any further suppression out front, should help thermals as this starts to come up. What I posted was not perfect, but small move in the right direction me thinks.
  15. Like I've been saying...I look for trends....even subtle ones, as we dont need much to have this deal be a crowd pleaser...even here in the LSV. SLP is SE and height field a bit better as you can see the 528 diving in. Doesnt mean really anything yet, but something to watch as we get closer
  16. So if it is….what would you or others think IF both gfs and euro ens showing? At some point ops take charge but IMO we aren’t there yet?
  17. Sittin in dr office. Gfs op leads the way fir the biggies. Hoping ens are still se or I’ll need a rubber ducky and not a shovel.
  18. With so many moving parts/variables....I ask you or others....why not? I get the whole east west ridge trough thingy, its been used as a tool for decades, but if it were that easy, we'd have nothing to chat about. Furthermore, we're not asking for 500 miles of moving here, were looking for 50-100 that makes a huge difference in our backyards....so yeah I say why not. Lastly, as I've done for some time, I put my thoughts out and follow them up w/ my logic/reasoning, and I don't wait to jump on any bandwagons or to make sure I'm right. Thats not my jam or why I'm' here. Right or wrong, I hope peeps that read my garble know that I'm not afraid to jump on something. After all...as weenies, that's what the fun of forecasting is isn't it? Now for more fun....off to the dentist.
  19. and one more to share. Op GFS Wonder Twins. Less diggy and one notably SE of the Op. Next panel shows even more separation. Ok now I'm done. Gotta run. Hope this helps.
  20. looking over 500s and was a 2 contour closed 500 lp, you can now see it opens up slightly (this would argue for a slightly less wound up solution and should/could help thermal boundary for us eastern folks). Again, I'm not saying its happening, but as one knows, this is the time to look for trends...good or bad. Just a verbatim obs...I look at this timestamp because this is when our precious thermals start to erode, so I'm looking for S and E adjustments for my logic to hold. If it doesnt...I'm always learning and never profess to have all of the answers.
×
×
  • Create New...