Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Terpeast

  1. 1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

    did you miss the LAST run where it gave us NOTHING!  why are you setting the bar at some obsolete run 4 cycles ago?  And frankly this run gives me more snow than that one did...it was a bomb for the coastal areas SE of 95 but it wasn't THAT good for places NW of 95.  This run was the most widespread snowstorm its shown on any run for our whole region and other then one bomb solution 24 hours ago a huge improvement over the last run which is what we usually compare a model to.  

    Tbf I look at 4-6 past runs to glean any meaningful trends. But if it’s jumpy, it doesn’t mean much it anything. 

  2. 1 minute ago, LeesburgWx said:

    4” storms are cool and all but we need a forum wide beast asap. Let’s be real

    I've been loving these 4-6" storms the past two winters, but I keep fantasizing about getting a big dump of 17", 30", or whatever big number.

    • Like 2
  3. 1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

    I mean there is a difference between getting 8” and being upset someone else got 12” and getting 3” when others got 8-12”.  I’m fine with not being the jack so long as I get into the “meat” of the storm and not another fringe 

    And there's a difference between getting a foot in your backyard while Boston gets 3 ft, and getting a foot and watching Raleigh getting 3 ft.

    • Like 4
  4. I agree with you, Chuck. I do some of this for a living now, and when others were saying "this is the most +PNA period" I thought something wasn't right. When tracking multiple snow events for mby, I didn't see a classic +PNA much of the time. If anything, it was mostly neutral with an AK ridge with some troughing undercutting it out west.

    • Like 1
    • 100% 1
×
×
  • Create New...