Jump to content

tavwtby

Members
  • Posts

    2,259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tavwtby

  1. 1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

    Yeah if you count both Mar/Apr 1997 it was around 45”. It kind of had a similar end of the season feel to it. The pattern got a lot better in March and we got some snow events but you always felt like you should’ve had a bigger one. Then when it seemed we had wasted the chance for more (there was a blown Winter storm warning on 3/23 I think) and everyone is moving into spring, the 3/31-4/1 storm happens. 

    yeah, what made 96-97 worse, until March anyway, was we were coming off a historic winter in 95-96, where it seemed we were getting 3-6/4-8 every three days or so, but I remember a good cold spell in 97, or am I mistaken?

    • Like 1
  2. 25 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

    Not much there to think a coastal can run into western SNE based on this setup . The block and next impulse out west should keep it either CC or east 

    I'll take a canal runner, although bad for eastern areas, my area has always done well with those, I'll also take a 4/97 redux, I had 18 in naugy at the time, but remember traveling to orh for work that day and was amazed how much was otg, iirc it was a blue bomb too, no?

  3. 16 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

    yea its a lot of work but fun, i agree. When the winters over im gonna make a bunch of them with different stats using the graphics that i normally do for this winter

    I spend a good part of my job taking data acquisition in various forms and deducing it to present in test reports, so I don't mind it at all, best is I get to spot seasonal trends in the data, and being a big pattern recognition guy, that satisfies me, ha!

  4. 6 hours ago, The 4 Seasons said:

    Some futility stats across the region...hopefully no errors this time but let me know.

    Station ID | Snowfall to date | Normal snowfall to date | % snowfall to normal to date | rank if no more snow fell | snowfall needed to tie record

    ALY | 41.9" | 48.6" | 86% | #16 | N/A

    ORH | 31.8" | 60.9" | 52% | #9 | N/A

    BDL | 19.6" | 43.8" | 45% | #10 | N/A

    BOS | 11.9" | 41.0" | 29% | #4 | N/A

    PVD | 11.5" | 31.4" | 37% | #5 | N/A

    BDR | 4.9" | 27.6" | 18% | #1 | 3.3" 

    LGA | 3.3" | 25.5" | 13% | #2 | N/A

    NYC | 2.2" | 25.9" | 8% | #1 | 0.6"

    JFK | 1.7" | 22.2" | 8% | #2 | N/A

    ISP | 3.4" | 26.3" | 13% | #2 | N/A

     

     

    love these stats, I've been slowly in spare time pouring over the data from just my area, dating back to 1897, and putting together plots for all parameters, almost feels like work, reducing data into readable format charts and graphs etc, fun though...

    • Thanks 1
  5. 1 minute ago, WinterWolf said:

    Yes 18 was super active.  We had one good one here. The first was windy rain here, the second was a good one.  And the third shit the bed here in the west, but buried them out east of the river(shocker righ). And then there was even one more that was a dud for the most part too here..a few sloppy inches. But they were lined up that March in 18. 

    iirc, they went right into April, out east was getting hammered with each one too, I think one of those I had hours of sugar while it dumped inches to knees east

  6. since moving up to Winsted from Waterbury in 13, we've had 4 seasons below 50", avg here dating back before 1900, is 83" but the avg since I've been here is 60", and that's including 3 above average winters...if I exclude 15-16, 18-19, 19-20, and 20-21, it's right at avg. That said, I need 8" more down the stretch to beat 15-16,  19-20, 1898-99, and 1912-13, as the bottom dwelling winters, sorry for the winded post, but in short, I think it's achievable by the looks of things

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...