Jump to content

tavwtby

Members
  • Posts

    2,259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tavwtby

  1. 2 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

     

    Matches pretty well with BOX map.

     

    1978868617_Screenshot(386).thumb.png.f1ee61caa9980969debb40463732396a.png

     

     

    man, can I buy 60 miles! always amazed me just how different the weather can be in the northeast, only a few miles can determine a foot or 4" of snow, minus the big region wide KU events that get every in on the goods. Really noticed just how much when I moved to Winsted from Waterbury, avg like 30" more a year, and Norfolk probably gets a good 10" more than I, and I can walk there in about an hour or so... crazy

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

    You want the best lift to line up with the snow growth zone (and be saturated). So on Paul’s sounding you see these bars sticking out horizontally from the left, those are omega bar which denote lift in the atmosphere….we want those to be at the same level as the SGZ but they were below the SGZ which means you’ll get crappier flakes. It does improve the next hour (as he showed in a later post). 

    thanks Will, I've never really dug into how the sounding plots really work, suppose I should get into it, useful info.what determines where the DGZ is, is it always at the same level, or does it change based on the lift, and dynamics of the levels? sorry for the elementary questions, just trying to get a grip on what I see.

    • Like 2
  3. 28 minutes ago, Connecticut Appleman said:

    Well we do have a little bit of DP to work with as it is currently 19 here, so if we can shed a few degrees before the precipitation starts, we might have a window to see some wintry stuff.

    probably best this is happening overnight, honestly if it was during the day it'd probably be rain, only good thing I see until this starts to wrap around close, by that time though I think it's too far east, hopefully I'm wrong.

  4. 28 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

    Should be a good week for us. 4 to 8 with lollies in Ct

    the way this winter has been, I'd be happy with this week just getting me more than 11", to surprise the lowest ever recorded here of 27.6", 15-16... currently sitting at 16 even after yesterday 1.3", this week does look good as currently shown for us in CT

  5. 2 minutes ago, UnitedWx said:

    Didn't we say it would do this yesterday, when it didn't align with other guidance.  And no doubt more waffling to come

    someone mentioned how the NAM nailed the small event we're seeing today, I don't recall seeing it on other models, perhaps it's onto something, I mean we're closing in on 48hrs or so from go time, so within range

×
×
  • Create New...