Jump to content

Nomz

Members
  • Posts

    696
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nomz

  1. Feels like its favoring the AIFS solution. edit: take that back it looks more GFS-like
  2. The bit of vort near Winnipeg. Further west and more amped/slower have ended up with good solutions so far.
  3. "Everything I don't like is an outlier" not great analysis imo
  4. NAM at h30 looks better than the AIFS (i don't have pivotal+) and UK, and worse than GFS and ICON.
  5. Also fwiw, some subjective model reanalysis from 48 hours: https://forecastwatch.com/2026/01/27/major-u-s-snowstorm-forecast-accuracy-analysis-january-23-26/ Good to know everyone blew it for us
  6. I believe thats what Euro AIFS and AIGFS do, no? Use AI to adjust raw model outputs?
  7. Was the weekend storm a miller c? From albright and cobb 2004. Checks out pretty well just from a brief look at mesoanalysis archive.
  8. Meanwhile, I will glaze euro aifs till I die edit: can we also get a storm banter thread?
  9. I was not expecting it at all. Tbh very unimpressed by DC snow removal ops.
  10. https://efisher828.github.io/weathernext/ Here's the only public source of weathernext 2 maps I believe. Like 12 hours behind and only ptype, rate, and 500mb heights.
  11. Got another day off and my chem exam postponed so I will be staying up for this 00z suite
  12. Yeah still looks just about the same as 12z and better than the other 12z models
  13. Yeah, looking at the op, I'm not sure why it hesitates for so long before deepening. Doesn't make much sense to me
  14. Kind of weird. It somewhat splits towards the end of the run which is very unlike what we've seen on other models
  15. At h90, looks better than 12z. Also looks better than 12z euro and UK, but not as good as 12z GFS.
  16. I think life would be a lot more fun if all we got were surface maps
  17. What do you mean by "Vorticity maps should be visualized 3 dimensionally"?
  18. They tell pretty much the same story though, no?
×
×
  • Create New...