Jump to content

Stormchaserchuck1

NO ACCESS TO PR/OT
  • Posts

    3,781
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stormchaserchuck1

  1. 21z RAP out to 51hrs was pretty juicy.. had a wide area of 6-8" from TN to WV.
  2. 60hr.. it's still snowing back to KY https://ibb.co/pJdmv8V
  3. Snow depth is 2"+ over a good portion of the area 54hr.. still snowing
  4. Seems to be a little more organized this run https://ibb.co/Q6Fxvw4
  5. 48hr Actually a pretty good difference vs the 18z NAM at 54hr.. vort max is in Omaha/N. Missouri vs western Nebraska
  6. It actually has pretty good snow depth considering how light.. 1-2"
  7. NAM has a pretty good 2-3" in central MD It does sometimes have a NW/wet bias.. so we'll see
  8. temps a little warmer.. 990mb low in south-central Canada. NS fighting for dominance on the NAM
  9. Does anyone else think it might be a little warm for the 2nd storm? That's a 500mb 482dm low off the south coast of Greenland at 165hr (++nao) and a 593dm high north of Puerto Rico.
  10. Trough a little more negative on 18z nam vs 12z https://ibb.co/wBfzCPt
  11. I know the NAM isn't ideal, but so far at 18z it's digging a bit more in the west. That's the trend we need to look for. Hudson bay vortex is in a slightly more favorable spot. small steps https://ibb.co/jH7WWDc
  12. You guys dont love this look? https://ibb.co/gyHKtGf It's close to a big storm That Aleutian island block.. if it doesn't go anywhere.. should help send the moisture further NW (slightly more amped SE ridge)
  13. If it hangs back later, we might be able to do a stronger storm, because that piece of the Polar Jet is rotating SW in SE Canada (to possibly phase.. or at least close to it) https://ibb.co/ZBPR9Qy
  14. It's colder this run.. stronger -NAO. I might take the trend, it's not as good as 18z, but there is potentially more upside
  15. 0z RGEM vs 18z GFS is similar to 0z NAM vs 18z gfs.. flatter trough, but hanging more energy back in the west.
×
×
  • Create New...