Jump to content

TimB

Members
  • Posts

    16,936
  • Joined

Everything posted by TimB

  1. For perspective, NWS gives us a 13% chance of 18”+ at PIT. I think I saw the Steelers have a 14% chance of winning.
  2. A storm where the “low end amount” map from the NWS has half of Allegheny County in the 8-12” range? Sign me up!
  3. I haven’t seen anything in the trends today that gives me reason to complain, and I’m a big time complainer at times.
  4. The NAM is not terrible. Hardly any mixing. Yes, there’s a dry slot after a 4” front end thump, then it fills in and drops another 5”+. I’d say it caved.
  5. Gradient is a lot sharper across the metro. “Official” total would be a bit below a foot but many of us would see well over.
  6. Well we do lose an inch or two off the 12z run, but still over a foot with 2” per hour rates between 3-6am Monday.
  7. It’s a positive sign that they haven’t put the possibility other p-types into the forecast, and that others like TWC haven’t added the “some mixed winter precipitation possible” wording. Using the 1/19/19 storm as an example, TWC carried mostly rain long before the NWS ever did.
  8. 12z RGEM was a sleetfest. That 12” total doesn’t seem to be mostly snow.
  9. Yeah, sure as hell not expecting 22”. Mostly just observing where it has the deform band, which is here.
  10. By the end of the run there’s 14” and still snowing. The stuff winter dreams are made of.
  11. 12z HRRR is looking great. Almost all snow and dry slotting stays SE. 6.4” through 42. A couple hours in there picked up almost 2”.
  12. Pivotal. Between the NAM and RGEM. I’m not a subscriber.
  13. Not sure the RAP is worth anything, but the 9z run had 22” at PIT.
  14. Yeah, just looked at it and I’d take it, no questions asked.
  15. We didn’t need an east shift when we woke up this morning but now we do. That’s the source of anxiety.
  16. Wouldn’t take much, the computer must be prehistoric with as slow as it loads.
×
×
  • Create New...