Jump to content

TimB

Members
  • Posts

    16,936
  • Joined

Everything posted by TimB

  1. How? I thought there was a Ross snow hole in the MLK storm.
  2. HRRR puts down a solid 5”, with some areas of the county exceeding 6” in places that see the lake enhanced bands in NW flow (which the NWS admits may be overdone).
  3. Meh. Next week looked warm even when we were hoping for a bigger storm, so even that wouldn’t have hung around long.
  4. So let’s say it’s 4”. Will it survive the sun angle of a mostly cloudy mid-March day with temperatures in the low 20s, or will it be gone before sunset?
  5. Not convinced we’re getting 4 either but it is what it is. On to thunderstorm season, then months of it being 88 and miserably humid while Syracuse gets to 95.
  6. GFS continues to look pretty good. Most everything else continues to look pretty meh. Something has to give.
  7. I think his comments make sense. If we get 2-4” we finish the winter with a total in the 30s, while if we get nothing we can still finish the winter with a total in the 20s which gives him more of an avenue to complain about how horrible this winter was.
  8. So basically the maps that were issued at 1:50 pm are based on 0z model runs?
  9. It’s not the watch that is perplexing. It’s more the fact that the forecast snow map actually increased from 5.3” to 6.4” in Pittsburgh despite the fact that the models seem to have gone the other way in the time between the issuances of those two maps.
  10. Maybe they’re including yesterday’s total in the 5-7?
  11. 5-7”? This is looking more and more like just a frontal passage for us.
  12. Hopefully it’s just the NAM being stupid but we’ve heard this song before and we know how it ends.
  13. HRRR looks progressive as hell. About 4”. NAM came back a tick NW. Not enough to put us in the bullseye but looks better than 6z.
  14. NWS official forecast is up to 5.3” but that will surely go down if the models, especially the NAM, are onto something. The 6z was a complete disaster (if you can actually reasonably apply words like “disaster” to not getting much snow).
  15. Won’t post the FV3 because it’s the FV3, but it’s weenie dream material.
  16. NAM with a tick SE. Too close for comfort but still a big hit, and a monster storm to our south and east. RGEM looks a lot like the NAM with where the heavy stuff lines up but gives us more breathing room on the western fringe.
  17. 18z GFS held serve. Also gives an idea of just how cold we could get Sunday morning (7) if we can manage at least partial clearing with a snowpack. Haven’t been into the single digits so late in March since 1993. GEFS ensemble mean keeps going up too. 6.6” with 81% of members showing a 4” snowfall.
  18. GFS scaled back a bit on Saturday but still showing about 7”, which is probably a more realistic expectation anyway.
  19. Don’t worry. I’m kidding. It’s 1000x more fun to get these types of events without a headline than with one.
  20. Just went out and measured about 3.75”. Where are all the “they should have issued an advisory” posts?
  21. This is one of the most beautiful p-type busts I can remember.
  22. “Pretty good” is an understatement. That’s close to a foot of Kuchera, but as @Burghblizzmentioned, that track may not be realistic. But the NAM seems to make that storm cut a lot more than the other models do. It’s already much improved from its earlier runs.
  23. Looks like a solid area of 30 to at times 40 dBZ returns moving through the metro now.
×
×
  • Create New...