Jump to content

SnowenOutThere

Members
  • Posts

    4,021
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SnowenOutThere

  1. Nam 3k though not great was good deal better than it's 6z a much more expansive field of precip and maybe a tiny nudge to the north. That said it is the NAM.
  2. Gfs continues the bring next weekends storm closer to us.
  3. Hrrr and the NAM 12k and the Canadians versus the GFS and NAM 3k with the euro sort of in the middle. Who will win
  4. Anyone else having the issue of the GFS being stuck at hour 222 right before a possible storm might hit?
  5. I would like to add a quick winter storm following the frontal passage before the great flood begins
  6. Its our turn with it every year, it's like a divorced dad saying to his x after spending one weekend a month with a kid how its now your turn with the kid and acting super wiped out from it. When we deal with it every year
  7. According to weather.us it gives us .6 to .8 QDF with .2 falling after it switches to snow. A significant improvement but the ICON SUCKS
  8. ICON looks to be a bit better, further north with the precip, but as always THE ICON SUCKS
  9. Last year we got a wet 2 inch snowstorm in the morning before melting later that day
  10. Wonder what the CMC will show with the RGEM showing a good setup at hour 84
  11. Looks like the improvements at h5 and the low being closer to the coast and stronger hurt us by robbing our moisture from the northern stream a bit? Highest snowfall closest to the coast and a sharper northern edge. Regardless the trend for the low to be closer and stronger (if it continues) would be a good way to get a lot more benefit from the coastal and is a good sign for a larger snowstorm being possible.
  12. Looks a good bit more neutral tilt around hour 90 compared to 6z
  13. I would be happy with 38, as for 14 I just thought it would be funny to see how inland it was
  14. Snow maps? Would like to see a couple of those panels (14, 38) for research purposes of course.
×
×
  • Create New...