Jump to content

WinterWxLuvr

Members
  • Posts

    29,279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WinterWxLuvr

  1. Just read the WWA for out here. Going on record that I don’t think there’s any way anywhere here gets 3-4”
  2. Been busy. Did they issue the WSW for the 5-10” yet?
  3. Poor PDIII. Gone is the consensus 5-10” storm
  4. So how does a WWA help that? People can either drive or they can’t. A WWA isn’t going to keep people from driving to work if they have to get there. Seems more in line with this whole nanny state thing IMO. You know, like when people have to have signs that say don’t crawl over the fence into the polar bear pen to get yourself a cool selfie.
  5. Why can’t models predict snow as well as they predict torches? oh wait, they already do
  6. I think you have a better chance of a blizzard on Monday than you do of him being fired.
  7. Next weeks storm just went bye bye on the gfs
  8. Watch the snow maps tick nw. Seems to always happen. Of course then there’s the whole thing about snow maps being a joke so ...
  9. The NAM looks to be making its way back. LOL, what a model
  10. How can we both have the same time stamp but different images???
  11. Not mostly useless, completely useless. A blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally and that’s the perfect analogy for anytime the weeklies are correct.
  12. We will know tomorrow. Wednesday at the latest.
  13. Let’s just go with the Alaskan style forecast. Chance of snow 50%. Accumulations 0 to 8”. Lows Tuesday night from 25 to 40.
  14. HPC has stuck with the higher snow totals well north and west. And what do precip events and cold fronts usually end up being at game time? Still not sure what to think of this one. Think I’d have to lean toward drier trend continuing. Even the wettest models have trended consistently drier over the past 18 hours. Would be nice to see one come in wetter even if only by a little.
  15. I think we can easily lock this in as T -6” type of deal.
  16. Tells you something about the snowstorm, huh? I don’t think any contract to any player over 4 years is a good deal.
  17. LOL, couple more runs and NAM will be partly cloudy
  18. Over a seven year period there aren’t many pitchers who aren’t.
  19. That’s a horrible contract move.
  20. I really have no interest in freezing rain. It’s a pain
  21. As PSU said, it’s pretty clear what the trends are.
  22. Pretty confident that the NAM has gone off wandering through the woods. Radical changes over the past few runs while the globals have been fairly consistent.
×
×
  • Create New...